• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Forming a company for all my assets"

Collapse

  • tim123
    replied
    Originally posted by aussielong View Post
    yeah but you don't take the assets out.
    You do if you want to personally benefit from them. What's the point of growing the value of your company if you can't spend the money that's inside?

    Originally posted by aussielong View Post
    you, erm, swap them for better ones, or summat. haven't you read Rich Dad Poor Dad?
    No, (I thought that was about how you accumulate the funds, not how you avoid tax on it once accumulated)

    tim

    Leave a comment:


  • aussielong
    replied
    Originally posted by beaker View Post
    Aussielong, if you are an Aussie as your name suggests then setting up a discretionary family trust is the best structure to hold all your investments, if you have a partner.

    ...
    It also has the advantage that you can put assets in the names of the other beneficiaries so if you ever get sued or anything you can protect your assets.
    Does this mean I can put my assets in my (retired) Mum's name? And then if I got divorced they wouldn't be included in what my missus was able to take off me?

    Leave a comment:


  • aussielong
    replied
    Originally posted by tim123 View Post
    Because

    a) the company has to pay tax on any profits.

    b) to actually benefit from the items in the company, you have to remove them from the company and you will pay the tax then.

    tim
    yeah but you don't take the assets out. you, erm, swap them for better ones, or summat. haven't you read Rich Dad Poor Dad?

    Leave a comment:


  • SandyDown
    replied
    Oh Beaker I really like your new avatar

    Leave a comment:


  • SandyDown
    replied
    Originally posted by Dow Jones View Post
    Obviously, don't use a UK-reg company, go offshore (non-EU) and hope for the best. I've told a lot of ex-GFs after our first intimate meeting that I was a previous bankrupt with no assets after - you should see how quickly they got up, put their clothes on and were gone!
    This would work to scare most girls,

    What do you think is a good thing to tell a guy (to get rid of or to test if he’s really interested in her and not her errrm money ) if the scenario was that the woman told the guy that she has been bankrupt /shopoholic and spends all her money on trivia/ prostituted / served time in prison would they leave? Any suggestions would be welcomed…. However I have a feeling saying ‘I got kids’ is the best thing to say

    Leave a comment:


  • beaker
    replied
    Originally posted by aussielong View Post
    Why doesn't it work?

    How can use of a Trust improve things?
    Aussielong, if you are an Aussie as your name suggests then setting up a discretionary family trust is the best structure to hold all your investments, if you have a partner.

    The trust allows you to distribute the profits of all the assets in the trust to any beneficiaries (your wife, kids, brother, sister etc). They then pay tax at their highest marginal rate on their trust income. So if your wife earns less than you, you can send more trust income her way and save tax overall. You can also distribute a small amount each year tax-free to your kids (under 18).

    It also has the advantage that you can put assets in the names of the other beneficiaries so if you ever get sued or anything you can protect your assets.

    I'm not sure if you can legally transfer the money in your UK company to your Aussie trust without paying tax on it in the UK first. I suspect not, because that money would not be considered an expense to your business. You should ask a UK-based an accountant about this. And speak to an Australian accountant about setting up a family trust.

    I'm not an accountant, I'm just a contractor learning how to play the game.

    Leave a comment:


  • beaker
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post


    no way round it - courts will see straight through that one. REcenly assets in an offshore trust had to be included - so the mrs got an extra £50m(Duffield?).

    Also, if you folks help you out and you get divorced then they cant just stop!

    If she has kids you will be looking at 70% of your assets lus 50% of income plus child support.

    I suggest you dont get married. And if you are married DONT have kids.
    Brillo - you seem to be the expert in these matters... is it 50% of your income for life? What happens if you don't work or if you earn less in one year, do you pay less?

    Leave a comment:


  • max
    replied
    Originally posted by aussielong View Post
    Why doesn't it work?
    Companies don't get the annual capital gains allowance, ie: this year £8,800 could be taken tax free.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post


    no way round it - courts will see straight through that one. REcenly assets in an offshore trust had to be included - so the mrs got an extra £50m(Duffield?).

    Also, if you folks help you out and you get divorced then they cant just stop!

    If she has kids you will be looking at 70% of your assets lus 50% of income plus child support.

    I suggest you dont get married. And if you are married DONT have kids.
    I though the advice from top divorce lawyers was:
    a. marry someone as rich or richer than you.
    b. don't have kids
    c. don't sign a pre-nup
    d. get divorced in England and Wales particularly if they are either richer than you or you signed a pre-nup.

    Leave a comment:


  • tim123
    replied
    Originally posted by aussielong View Post
    Why doesn't it work?

    How can use of a Trust improve things?
    Because

    a) the company has to pay tax on any profits.

    b) to actually benefit from the items in the company, you have to remove them from the company and you will pay the tax then.

    tim

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by Sockpuppet View Post
    Funny. Telling them I am a lorry driver does the same. But its also part truth



    wasn't there a viz lorry-driver character? The gag being that they are all serial killers - stopped by police and fined for being under their body count quota etcetc...

    Is it that which puts them off?

    Leave a comment:


  • Sockpuppet
    replied
    Originally posted by Dow Jones View Post
    Obviously, don't use a UK-reg company, go offshore (non-EU) and hope for the best. I've told a lot of ex-GFs after our first intimate meeting that I was a previous bankrupt with no assets after - you should see how quickly they got up, put their clothes on and were gone!
    Funny. Telling them I am a lorry driver does the same. But its also part truth

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    A socialist government will never let a "poor" woman (down trodden oppressed by men) lose out financially to a "rich" man. It's all about "fairness".

    Hence pre-nups are powerless. Any court win will be overturned at appeal and cost you dearly.

    If you want you believe in a pre-nup, go ahead. You are deluding yourself.

    HTH


    good post - this is it in a nutshell

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by tay View Post
    Yes they do, some guy won a case just the other day based on a pre nup. Doesnt guarntee anything, but it is at least a factor.

    total rubbish - I have an article coming out on hereisthecitynews on Tuesday which will de-bunk this myth.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by aussielong View Post
    I'm thinking of registering a company and putting everything through that:

    .Investment properties I will buy in 2008
    .Shares I will buy in 2008
    .Any assets going forward

    My reasons for doing this are:

    . Pay less tax
    . Avoid losing half of my assets if I marry and later get divorced

    Is this a reasonable plan? Especially the marriage bit. If i'm technically only an employee/director/(?) of the company, and the company owns the assets - will she be able to get 'er 'ands on them in a divorce?


    no way round it - courts will see straight through that one. REcenly assets in an offshore trust had to be included - so the mrs got an extra £50m(Duffield?).

    Also, if you folks help you out and you get divorced then they cant just stop!

    If she has kids you will be looking at 70% of your assets lus 50% of income plus child support.

    I suggest you dont get married. And if you are married DONT have kids.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X