• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "What newspaper do you read?"

Collapse

  • Clippy
    replied
    Originally posted by Bagpuss View Post
    I was unshaven and my hair was long, he probably expected me to be on crack.
    Or Shameless.

    Leave a comment:


  • Clippy
    replied
    Originally posted by SallyAnne View Post
    It depends whether I want to read about the world, about London, about footballers shagging pop stars, or about how horrible immigrants are.

    I think the least horrible is the independant...but even that has got on my nerves over the last year.
    Agree - particularly regarding the Indy.

    They seem to have lost their way.

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    You can do sudoku? That must put you into the top 0.01% of all agents.
    Let's be honest, you can get into the top 10% of agents by chewing whilst you walk though.

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    No I never read those diaries, shame! I will look more closely at it in future. I like the reviews, the dishing of Ken Livingstone and I quite like their finance pages. Also the TV guide is very simple to follow. I can also do the back page Sudoku between work and hiome.
    You can do sudoku? That must put you into the top 0.01% of all agents. Bet it's the easy one though

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by WotNxt View Post
    I find their political pain quite entertaining actually. If they weren't so pompous about everything it would be better though.

    Did you ever used to read that column about the single girl's lovelife by Laura Topham (Tup'em?). That was hilarious reading - it was screamingly obvious that no man was ever going to want a long term relationship with the poor girl until she sorted her f'ing head out.
    No I never read those diaries, shame! I will look more closely at it in future. I like the reviews, the dishing of Ken Livingstone and I quite like their finance pages. Also the TV guide is very simple to follow. I can also do the back page Sudoku between work and hiome.

    Leave a comment:


  • WotNxt
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    What I dont like is their column writers Cohen and Self who are a pair of Islington lefties. They now find themselves being wonderfully confronted by the failure of the political ideals of NL which they have so long supported.
    I find their political pain quite entertaining actually. If they weren't so pompous about everything it would be better though.

    Did you ever used to read that column about the single girl's lovelife by Laura Topham (Tup'em?). That was hilarious reading - it was screamingly obvious that no man was ever going to want a long term relationship with the poor girl until she sorted her f'ing head out.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by Bagpuss View Post
    I resent the fact that even factual articles have to be spun to the politics of the proprietors. They can uncover corruption by having a go at all with the same vigour. This is why a newspaper like the Telegraph annoys me, excellent in places it spoils it with blatent propaganda, are the readers not intelligent enough to decide for themselves? Much the same can be said for the Daily Mail.
    Daily Mail readers intelligent?

    They would be much better of reading The Sun or The Mirror as at least the headlines have some relevance to the story below it.

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by WotNxt View Post
    Political, yes.

    But overall (as opposed to individual columnists) would you say it has a political bias and, if so, to which politics?

    To me it seems to be fairly neutral politically but maybe that is just because my political views are closely matched to theirs. When I read any other newspaper now the political views that come through (either blatantly or "between the lines") just jar so badly.
    Well obviously if you like the Standard then you will agree with their political position, which presumably is quite neutral. Now neutral to me shows a blatant political bias (towards neutrality) of its own. I like the standard politically mainly because it challenges that arse Ken Livingstone. What I dont like is their column writers Cohen and Self who are a pair of Islington lefties. They now find themselves being wonderfully confronted by the failure of the political ideals of NL which they have so long supported.

    Leave a comment:


  • WotNxt
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    The evening standard is as political as any newspaper. There are few commentators as opinionated as Will Self (serving) for example.
    Political, yes.

    But overall (as opposed to individual columnists) would you say it has a political bias and, if so, to which politics?

    To me it seems to be fairly neutral politically but maybe that is just because my political views are closely matched to theirs. When I read any other newspaper now the political views that come through (either blatantly or "between the lines") just jar so badly.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bagpuss
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    I should think anyone would be nervous if they found you standing behind them.

    Unless their name is Pete Tatchell
    I was unshaven and my hair was long, he probably expected me to be on crack

    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    The impartial ones tend not to last long.

    Apart from anything else why on earth should'nt newspapers express a view? They all have their own agendas but quite frequently they publish articles from people from opposite ends of the political spectrum. It is a vital necessity that journalists crawl around uncovering activities of grubby little politicians and then putting forward their points of view.

    You dont have to agree with them or read them.

    I resent the fact that even factual articles have to be spun to the politics of the proprietors. They can uncover corruption by having a go at all with the same vigour. This is why a newspaper like the Telegraph annoys me, excellent in places it spoils it with blatent propaganda, are the readers not intelligent enough to decide for themselves? Much the same can be said for the Daily Mail.
    Last edited by Bagpuss; 19 December 2007, 12:29.

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by Bagpuss View Post
    I was once stood behind Max Hastings at a parking meter he initially looked as miserable as one of his rants, then looked a little nervous, maybe he expected me to mug him.
    I should think anyone would be nervous if they found you standing behind them.

    Unless their name is Pete Tatchell

    Leave a comment:


  • Bagpuss
    replied
    I was once stood behind Max Hastings at a parking meter he initially looked as miserable as one of his rants, then looked a little nervous, maybe he expected me to mug him.

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by WotNxt View Post
    Why no Evening Standard in the list?

    Can't stand the national papers as they are all too politically biased in their own way.

    If I ever have the time then I read the Sunday Times but otherwise its just the ES while eating my lunch.

    Always find it a bit annoying that the nationals report the same stories as the ES but a day later!
    The evening standard is as political as any newspaper. There are few commentators as opinionated as Will Self (serving) for example.

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by Bagpuss View Post
    I resent the fact that when you buy a newspaper in this country you have political propaganda rammed down your throat. All newspapers should report the news impartially, few if any do.
    The impartial ones tend not to last long.

    Apart from anything else why on earth should'nt newspapers express a view? They all have their own agendas but quite frequently they publish articles from people from opposite ends of the political spectrum. It is a vital necessity that journalists crawl around uncovering activities of grubby little politicians and then putting forward their points of view.

    You dont have to agree with them or read them.

    Leave a comment:


  • WotNxt
    replied
    Why no Evening Standard in the list?

    Can't stand the national papers as they are all too politically biased in their own way.

    If I ever have the time then I read the Sunday Times but otherwise its just the ES while eating my lunch.

    Always find it a bit annoying that the nationals report the same stories as the ES but a day later!

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X