• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "The new England manager"

Collapse

  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by wendigo100 View Post


    I was reading something by Paul Ince recently (now a demi-god down my way, but we'll let that go), and he says the problem with England's squad is not the lack of quality, but the lack of leaders on the pitch.

    Good sides have at least four in the team who can drag a side up and change a game. At Euro 96 he said we had Seaman, Pearce, Adams, Ince himself, Sherringham and Shearer, all strong personalities who knew what to do (except take penalties of course, but we'll let that go as well. )

    Similar in 1998. He says now we only have Terry, and when he's missing, no-one. I'd add Gary Neville but he's been injured for ages and may never play for England again.
    Yeah read that too. Element of truth in it - if you ignore Incey's self promotion. Also Beckenbauer says the the same thing - and that's a bloke I respect in footy.

    Leave a comment:


  • wendigo100
    replied
    Originally posted by TonyEnglish View Post
    "Is the pope a catholic? "

    I dunno but I think he sh!ts in the woods though


    I was reading something by Paul Ince recently (now a demi-god down my way, but we'll let that go), and he says the problem with England's squad is not the lack of quality, but the lack of leaders on the pitch.

    Good sides have at least four in the team who can drag a side up and change a game. At Euro 96 he said we had Seaman, Pearce, Adams, Ince himself, Sherringham and Shearer, all strong personalities who knew what to do (except take penalties of course, but we'll let that go as well. )

    Similar in 1998. He says now we only have Terry, and when he's missing, no-one. I'd add Gary Neville but he's been injured for ages and may never play for England again.

    Leave a comment:


  • BoredBloke
    replied
    "Is the pope a catholic? "

    I dunno but I think he sh!ts in the woods though

    Leave a comment:


  • wendigo100
    replied
    Originally posted by Mailman View Post
    Its gonna end in tears I tells ya! Tears!

    Mailman
    Is the pope a catholic?

    Leave a comment:


  • Mailman
    replied
    Its gonna end in tears I tells ya! Tears!

    Mailman

    Leave a comment:


  • wendigo100
    replied
    Originally posted by snaw View Post
    Eh?!?! - name a better crosser of the ball in world football? And his passing is superb as well ...
    Beckham WAS a great crosser. He hasn't been for a long time. Half of them don't get past the first defender.

    The only reason he gets any success these days is because he takes every single dead-ball kick that we get in the opposition half, and so by law of averages...

    Mind you, his cross for Crouch's goal against Croatia was superb.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dow Jones
    replied
    That will cheer you up!

    A bit like investment bankers, some on £ 100k earn millions for their clients, others on £ 500k or more lose them - hand over fist!

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by Dow Jones View Post
    I read that most of the Croatian players were earning in a year what most of the England players earn in a month - obviously motivation has got nothing to do with money.
    Month? Try week - and I doubt they get £100k pa.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dow Jones
    replied
    Experts

    Not a great expert on football (unlike some here), but I think the main problem that any England manager faces is how to motivate 15-20 multi-millionaires that can't be bothered to put a decent performance when they put the England shirt. Look at Gerrard, truly awful against Croatia on that Wednesday, played his best game despite being booed off at Newcastle the following Saturday.
    I read that most of the Croatian players were earning in a year what most of the England players earn in a month - obviously motivation has got nothing to do with money.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by snaw View Post
    Not quite sure how this helps your anti-beckham campaign ...
    Every little helps

    Leave a comment:


  • snaw
    replied
    He dropped Beckham because he signed for LA Galaxy and Capello (Probably under the influence of Calderon) said that he didn't believe he would give his all for the club. He was playing well before he got dropped, didn't publicy whinge about it but got on with training and played well after he was re-instated, much to the delight of the clubs fans, the press and his team mates.

    Not quite sure how this helps your anti-beckham campaign ...

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Capello will teach Bechkam a lesson - he dropped him earlier this year until this guy stopped dressing in womens underwear and started training to actually earn his place in top 11. I doubt he will make it again though because he is playing in mickey mouse league right now

    Leave a comment:


  • snaw
    replied
    Yep - but you're talking about Beckham specifically. Any old monkey can roll out the England isn't playing like a team line, cause it's blatantly true. You're bagging Beckham and responding to a comment on his crossing/passing as being "What this means is that English Team is really in a truly aweful state of affairs."

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by snaw View Post
    Eh?!?! - name a better crosser of the ball in world football? And his passing is superb as well ...
    Beckham is best crosser.
    Terry is best defender.
    Owen/etc are best strikers.

    But together they don't play like a team and clearly they don't give 100%, most likely because they know if they get injured then their clubs won't give them bonus or something, in other words their loyalty is to their club.

    England has got good players, but no team - that's because they don't play with each other, but against each other - few days training together before the match simply does not cut it - they are not a team.

    Look at how Croatians were playing in the last match where they already won their place, would have England played as hard in their position? I think not. And this is exactly the problem.

    Leave a comment:


  • snaw
    replied
    Eh?!?! - name a better crosser of the ball in world football? And his passing is superb as well ...

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X