• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Train fares to rise"

Collapse

  • lilelvis2000
    replied
    Originally posted by Bagpuss View Post
    Isn't that the current set up? IMHO Rail privatisation should never have happened, it costs the taxpayer as much as it ever did and the service is hardly any better. The free market can never work in an oligopoly situation
    A complete lack of vision on that one. Same goes for buses. Recently our concil sold the bus company they owned 100%. Now the new bus company wants to slash service - unless the council puts out a tender for subsidy. ie: we were previously subsidising it before, looks like we'll have to do it again. And who convinced the council to sell it in the first place? The same bus company!! (which is foreign owned).

    As well, this morning when the train broke down...If transport in this wretched north west was integrated, I could have used my rail ticket on the bus..nope had to cough up £1.40 for a 10 minute ride. Well at least the bus was heated and the ride smooth. And it got to my destination in 10 minutes. About the same speed as the train from that point!

    Leave a comment:


  • NoddY
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    Dunno. Where does all the money go then? In energy terms one could cycle what, perhaps 50 miles for the cost of a bar of chocolate? That’s maybe an order of magnitude cheaper than transporting hundreds of passengers at a time by train, all of whom are using up a not insubstantial fraction as much energy just sitting there anyway. Not that I’m advocating cycling or anything, just trying to make sense of the cost of travel by train, and failing. Telling me that the gov’t are subsidising rails too, isn’t helping me at all

    The money ultimately ends up, where all wealth ends up, back at Moneylender Towers on the Wharf:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HSBC_Rail

    Crony capitalism: free markets for the poor and socialism for the rich.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Dunno. Where does all the money go then? In energy terms one could cycle what, perhaps 50 miles for the cost of a bar of chocolate? That’s maybe an order of magnitude cheaper than transporting hundreds of passengers at a time by train, all of whom are using up a not insubstantial fraction as much energy just sitting there anyway. Not that I’m advocating cycling or anything, just trying to make sense of the cost of travel by train, and failing. Telling me that the gov’t are subsidising rails too, isn’t helping me at all

    Leave a comment:


  • Bagpuss
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    Maybe things would improve if the gov’t looked after the rails (as with roads) and private firms operate the trains?
    Isn't that the current set up? IMHO Rail privatisation should never have happened, it costs the taxpayer as much as it ever did and the service is hardly any better. The free market can never work in an oligopoly situation

    Leave a comment:


  • Spacecadet
    replied
    Originally posted by Sockpuppet View Post
    Here in Poland a return to Warsaw from Krakow bought on the day in First Class (reserved seat in a compartment) is £20 return!
    yup - Europe has what can be considered "normal" train prices, even if you buy on the day. Infact i think that booking in advance doesn't give you any special discount.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rymez2K
    replied
    Originally posted by Ruprect View Post
    Given the oustanding level of service, the cleanliness of the carriages and the fact that I always get a seat, and the train is not always a completely tuliping overcrowded, tardy tuliphole I think the rises are absolutely justified.
    Obviously not a first capital connect commuter then.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    How is it that transporting passenger packed trains, from one fixed point to another, is so darned expensive? Maybe things would improve if the gov’t looked after the rails (as with roads) and private firms operate the trains?

    Leave a comment:


  • lilelvis2000
    replied
    Does the government subsidy also go up by the same amount. Besides all Londoners are over-paid investment bankers anyway. y'all can afford 'em, even at twice the price. We're lucky up here if the train can hold itself together for the entire journey. This morning it didn't..I ended up taking the bus..another travesty of privitisation.

    Anybody ever think that if Labour wasn't in bed with the private operators, they might think that buying the TOCs out would be cheaper than the subsidy?

    Leave a comment:


  • Sockpuppet
    replied
    Here in Poland a return to Warsaw from Krakow bought on the day in First Class (reserved seat in a compartment) is £20 return!

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Originally posted by Troll View Post
    Didn't you win a prize last year or sumfink?
    Biggest member of the year award or something.

    I was funny then.

    Leave a comment:


  • chef
    replied
    my only complaint is that 1st class meals need improving, otherwise, overcrowding, seat size/space are all not so much a problem..

    HTH

    Leave a comment:


  • Troll
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    Didn't you win a prize last year or sumfink? Will you be entering this year?
    Last edited by Troll; 28 November 2007, 12:38.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ruprect
    replied
    Given the oustanding level of service, the cleanliness of the carriages and the fact that I always get a seat, and the train is not always a completely tuliping overcrowded, tardy tuliphole I think the rises are absolutely justified.

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Roads are gridlocked.

    Congestion charge is going up.

    I think they want people to use trains.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    The issue is that the trains are too crowded so they want people to use other modes of transport.

    I think they mean cars

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X