• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Hourly Doom Update

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Hourly Doom Update"

Collapse

  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    Prices will not fall much, a few % tops.

    You need mass unemployment for that, and Gordon will just create another million tax-payer funded non-job in the public sector to stave off any unemployment.

    So keep dreaming of your 40% falls.
    It's beginning to seem to me that people in the private sector are the mugs.
    Did anyone see in the Times what the top quango guys earn and spend?
    Maybe it's time to get a cushy senior level public sector management job.
    If you can't beat 'em, join 'em and all that.
    maybe IR35 was a good idea after all

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Prices will not fall much, a few % tops.

    You need mass unemployment for that, and Gordon will just create another million tax-payer funded non-job in the public sector to stave off any unemployment.

    So keep dreaming of your 40% falls.

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Anyway lets hope for a good 40%, eh?

    Leave a comment:


  • tim123
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    Prices will not fall massively as long as there are no mass redundancies as happened in the early 90s. People will merely stay put and not move rather than take a loss.
    I think you are wrong.

    There are enough forced sales each year (death, divorce, job moves, BTL cashing in etc) to make a noticable difference.

    In any case if there are no sales at all, that will look even worse than a 10% fall in prices.

    tim

    Leave a comment:


  • Bagpuss
    replied
    The traditional BTL model stopped working around mid 2004, that's when 'investors' had to rely on larger deposits or gamble on discounted rates. All those people are at risk IMHO. What percentage they make up of the total market is anyones guess, but given the exponential growth I'd hazzard at least 10% and probably much higher, irrespective once the panic begins...

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by Bagpuss View Post
    Well we need figures on BTL mortgages approved by year, one suspects all those after 2004 will be.

    # approved after 2004/total since 99 say would give a rough estimate
    Why 2004? That assumes a much greater than 7% fall. The City is betting on 7% which takes it to sometime last year.

    Leave a comment:


  • Clippy
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    So the question is really what percentage of BTL landlords are over-leveraged.
    I suspect it's a smallish proportion.
    Really?

    I would have thought it's a fair number especially as the whole climate was geared towards complete novices being able to take out massive mortgages with a limited deposit.

    Don't forget, one of the 'stars' of the mortgage world was the the Self-cert mortgage.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bagpuss
    replied
    Well we need figures on BTL mortgages approved by year, one suspects all those after 2004 will be.

    # approved after 2004/total since 99 say would give a rough estimate

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by BlasterBates View Post
    ...ah the problem apparently, is BTL. When mortgages are renewed next year lenders will be demanding far more capital, like 20% extra, those that can't find it will probably forced into a sale. This will happen next year.
    Post a linky.
    I don't think that's true. Interest rates may be raised but I don't think lenders will suddenly change the LTV on existing mortgages.

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    So the question is really what percentage of BTL landlords are over-leveraged.
    I suspect it's a smallish proportion.

    Leave a comment:


  • Clippy
    replied
    Originally posted by BlasterBates View Post
    ...ah the problem apparently, is BTL. When mortgages are renewed next year lenders will be demanding far more capital, like 20% extra, those that can't find it will probably forced into a sale. This will happen next year.
    Interestingly, an article on this appeared int' paper a few days ago.

    http://tinyurl.com/363oje

    Agree, that if there are redundancies, then the house of cards will start to crumble.

    What about if the Polish builders etc start to head home, surely this wil have an effect too.

    Edit: More doom: http://tinyurl.com/3c78fo
    Last edited by Clippy; 26 November 2007, 15:35.

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    I got out last year. I have a war chest ready - I want a massive fall.
    <tick><tock>

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by Churchill View Post
    Take a loss?

    That will only happen with negative equity.

    Now that my divorce settlement is sorted I'm looking to buy a new house.

    I think I'll wait until some of you BTL whallas start feeling the strain...

    <tick><tock>
    I got out last year. I have a war chest ready - I want a massive fall.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bagpuss
    replied
    Originally posted by BlasterBates View Post
    ...ah the problem apparently, is BTL. When mortgages are renewed next year lenders will be demanding far more capital, like 20% extra, those that can't find it will probably forced into a sale. This will happen next year.
    Have you been cut and pasting my old posts

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    Prices will not fall massively as long as there are no mass redundancies as happened in the early 90s. People will merely stay put and not move rather than take a loss.
    Take a loss?

    That will only happen with negative equity.

    Now that my divorce settlement is sorted I'm looking to buy a new house.

    I think I'll wait until some of you BTL whallas start feeling the strain...

    <tick><tock>

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X