• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Gordon Brown hits his all-time low"

Collapse

  • TheFaQQer
    replied
    Originally posted by administrator View Post
    Actually I would have banned him either way, the poll was just a bit of fun.
    Not quite what you said at the time:

    Originally posted by administrator View Post
    The poll was to make sure this banning was not done just because one or two admins felt it should be so.

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by Bagpuss View Post
    That's SASguru gone then
    I only have one fake character on here

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by Bagpuss View Post
    Why is SAS always crying out for bannings?

    Quite the opposite actually. Most forums have some minimum standards, this one is as liberal as it gets, which I like. But you have to draw the line somewhere, if only for legal reasons.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheFaQQer
    replied
    Originally posted by cailin maith View Post
    There you are...
    I'll be over in a minute, don't worry!

    Leave a comment:


  • cailin maith
    replied
    There you are...

    Leave a comment:


  • TheFaQQer
    replied
    Originally posted by administrator View Post
    Actually I would have banned him either way, the poll was just a bit of fun. For one who is usually so flippant you are really quite serious about this point FaQQer.
    I don't like to see mob mentality anywhere, which is what a poll essentially descended into.

    You'll find my most serious posts in TPD

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Originally posted by administrator View Post
    but being a complete noddy, while as an alias or main ID, is not tolerated.
    Perhaps we might want to "up the bar" a bit there or it could end up resembling Tumbleweed Junction round here!
    And for folk like Churchill he would need rehab again if one of his "fraternities" showed him the door.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bagpuss
    replied
    Originally posted by administrator View Post
    Yes, we all know that multiple IDs here are a bit of fun to be had to while away the day but being a complete noddy, while as an alias or main ID, is not tolerated. Any regulars posting offensive garbage using their main ID or an alias will find the lot banned.
    That's SASguru gone then

    Leave a comment:


  • administrator
    replied
    Originally posted by shaunbhoy View Post
    Indeed. What a break with tradition that would be.
    Yes, we all know that multiple IDs here are a bit of fun to be had to while away the day but being a complete noddy, while as an alias or main ID, is not tolerated. Any regulars posting offensive garbage using their main ID or an alias will find the lot banned.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bagpuss
    replied
    Why is SAS always crying out for bannings?

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Originally posted by ferret View Post
    let's hope it is not a regular user who is trying to be clever
    Indeed. What a break with tradition that would be.

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by Churchill View Post
    bark bark yip yip.
    There's a good doggy, now back to your kennel.

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    If you followed the whole sorry saga, you will know that there was a good reason.
    I'm sure he's been banned from other fora too - you can tell coz he keeps coming back to us "losers", as he terms us.
    You SASGURU! He defines you as a loser. That in my book makes him a good judge of character, whatever his other faults.

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
    No, actually, he wasn't. He was banned because the mob mentality on CUK decided that if everyone voted to ban him, then he would be banned. Whether there was build up to an inevitable ban was never explored - there was a public, X-factor style vote, and he was banned off the back of it.

    I'm not suggesting one way or the other whether CD should have been banned or not - I made my opinion known in the banning vote thread. However, to say that he was banned for a good reason is incorrect.
    If you followed the whole sorry saga, you will know that there was a good reason.
    I'm sure he's been banned from other fora too - you can tell coz he keeps coming back to us "losers", as he terms us.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by DiscoStu View Post
    I'm Spartacus
    Spartacus kisses boyfriend:
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/liv...n_page_id=1773

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X