Reply to: Gordon Brown hits his all-time low

[TheFaQQer]

Actually I would have banned him either way, the poll was just a bit of fun.

Not quite what you said at the time:

The poll was to make sure this banning was not done just because one or two admins felt it should be so.

[sasguru]

That's SASguru gone then

I only have one fake character on here

[sasguru]

Why is SAS always crying out for bannings?

Quite the opposite actually. Most forums have some minimum standards, this one is as liberal as it gets, which I like. But you have to draw the line somewhere, if only for legal reasons.

[TheFaQQer]

There you are...

I'll be over in a minute, don't worry!

[cailin maith]

There you are...

[TheFaQQer]

Actually I would have banned him either way, the poll was just a bit of fun. For one who is usually so flippant you are really quite serious about this point FaQQer.

I don't like to see mob mentality anywhere, which is what a poll essentially descended into.

You'll find my most serious posts in TPD

[shaunbhoy]

but being a complete noddy, while as an alias or main ID, is not tolerated.

Perhaps we might want to "up the bar" a bit there or it could end up resembling Tumbleweed Junction round here!
And for folk like Churchill he would need rehab again if one of his "fraternities" showed him the door.

[Bagpuss]

Yes, we all know that multiple IDs here are a bit of fun to be had to while away the day but being a complete noddy, while as an alias or main ID, is not tolerated. Any regulars posting offensive garbage using their main ID or an alias will find the lot banned.

That's SASguru gone then

[administrator]

Indeed. What a break with tradition that would be.

Yes, we all know that multiple IDs here are a bit of fun to be had to while away the day but being a complete noddy, while as an alias or main ID, is not tolerated. Any regulars posting offensive garbage using their main ID or an alias will find the lot banned.

[Bagpuss]

Why is SAS always crying out for bannings?

[shaunbhoy]

let's hope it is not a regular user who is trying to be clever

Indeed. What a break with tradition that would be.

[sasguru]

bark bark yip yip.

There's a good doggy, now back to your kennel.

[Churchill]

If you followed the whole sorry saga, you will know that there was a good reason.
I'm sure he's been banned from other fora too - you can tell coz he keeps coming back to us "losers", as he terms us.

You SASGURU! He defines you as a loser. That in my book makes him a good judge of character, whatever his other faults.

[sasguru]

No, actually, he wasn't. He was banned because the mob mentality on CUK decided that if everyone voted to ban him, then he would be banned. Whether there was build up to an inevitable ban was never explored - there was a public, X-factor style vote, and he was banned off the back of it.

I'm not suggesting one way or the other whether CD should have been banned or not - I made my opinion known in the banning vote thread. However, to say that he was banned for a good reason is incorrect.

If you followed the whole sorry saga, you will know that there was a good reason.
I'm sure he's been banned from other fora too - you can tell coz he keeps coming back to us "losers", as he terms us.

[TimberWolf]

I'm Spartacus

Spartacus kisses boyfriend:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/liv...n_page_id=1773