Reply to: Was Enoch Powell right?

[TimberWolf]

Similarly a random program generator’s unlikely to find polynomial time solutions to NP complete problems. Even if left to run overnight.

This text was computer generated and any resemblance to works of fiction or being even slightly interesting is entirely coincidental.

[sasguru]

The best they could come up with was this

Yes every single one of those monkeys thought their random witterings were actually interesting.

[DimPrawn]

It was once thought if you had an infinite number of monkeys hitting a typewriter one would eventually create all the works of Shakespere. Yet, with the advent of the internet we know this to be untrue.

The best they could come up with was this

[sasguru]

It was once thought if you had an infinite number of monkeys hitting a typewriter one would eventually create all the works of Shakespere. Yet, with the advent of the internet we know this to be untrue.

Indeed.

[Churchill]

Yet, can be considered a more advanced philosophy.

Quite, satisfies both the corporeal and ethereal constructs.

[threaded]

To be able to eat ALL the pies one must first exist in corpulent form, don't you think?

It was once thought if you had an infinite number of monkeys hitting a typewriter one would eventually create all the works of Shakespere. Yet, with the advent of the internet we know this to be untrue.

[threaded]

"I ate all the pies" although poetic in itself, doesn't have quite the same ring to it as "I think, therefore I am". Does it?

Yet, can be considered a more advanced philosophy.

[sasguru]

"I ate all the pies" although poetic in itself, doesn't have quite the same ring to it as "I think, therefore I am". Does it?

To be able to eat ALL the pies one must first exist in corpulent form, don't you think?

[Churchill]

Well, that is opposing point of view, from Descartes.

Yet I recon to be able to think one has to firstly exist.

"I ate all the pies" although poetic in itself, doesn't have quite the same ring to it as "I think, therefore I am". Does it?

[threaded]

Yeah but you're all figments of my imagination anyway.

Well, that is opposing point of view, from Descartes.

Yet I recon to be able to think one has to firstly exist.

[Churchill]

Close, but no cigar: Existentialist.

Yeah but you're all figments of my imagination anyway.

[threaded]

Thanks for that. Is it in "yorkie" or summat?

Close, but no cigar: Existentialist.

[Churchill]

Frankly, it'd be lost on you anyway. So you've not missed anything.

Thanks for that. Is it in "yorkie" or summat?

[threaded]

I've not seen it dear boy.

Frankly, it'd be lost on you anyway. So you've not missed anything.

[Churchill]

And still getting loads of hits!

I've not seen it dear boy.