- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: How they messed up F1
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "How they messed up F1"
Collapse
-
Jenson has been a little unlucky, he's hit the big teams when they haven't had the best car, In a MacClaren or Ferrari he would have been challenging for the title. Mansel had a go at him recently for wasting his talent, he wouldn't even bother if he were no good.
-
Originally posted by Bagpuss View Post8 points for second is far too much. I want to see the best win not the driver with the most reliable car.
Re Jenson Button, very talented guy but likes the good life a little too much, he's not focused, but Honda will be back, fortunes chance very quickly in F1
Jenson just like to party I think now. He's essentially thrown away his best years now. He's got little chance of a better ride now.
Maybe Honda is too busy focusing on getting into NASCAR?
Leave a comment:
-
No, it was before the start of the season... but don't let that get in the way of a good story.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/moto...ne/7055633.stm
Ferrari are famous for having a team huddle at Madonna di Campiglio ski resort before the season starts so I guess its no big deal to them.Last edited by gingerjedi; 23 October 2007, 10:33.
Leave a comment:
-
I saw on the BBC website Raikonnen entered a snomobile race a couple of days before the Brazilian grand prix under the name of james hunt
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Bagpuss View PostRe Jenson Button, very talented guy but likes the good life a little too much, he's not focused, but Honda will be back, fortunes chance very quickly in F1
The last few seasons have been a bit of an embarrassment for Honda especially as they pride themselves so much on engineering innovation, like you said they'll come good sooner or later.
Leave a comment:
-
8 points for second is far too much. I want to see the best win not the driver with the most reliable car.
Re Jenson Button, very talented guy but likes the good life a little too much, he's not focused, but Honda will be back, fortunes chance very quickly in F1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TheFaQQer View PostBigger points gap between first and second places. Return to the old system where you took the best 14 of your results.
One benefit to the more even spread of points is it makes it more likely the championship goes down to the last race, which everybody wants to see. The days of Schumacher winning by the 10th race make for a pretty dull year. This year literally couldn't have been closer.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by VectraMan View PostI think you've got the quotes in the wrong place. You meant: Team orders are "not allowed".
McLaren were perfectly fair on their drivers IMO. If anything you have to say that Alonso lost it by crashing in Japan, and Hamilton lost it by crashing in the pit lane entrance in China. Two unforced driver errors that were nothing to do with the team.
As for the point system, what are you going to do? Only reward points to the winner? I think there's an argument for allocating points all the way down to last place as the current system tends to be a bit unfair on the people that regularly finish 9th (thereby beating 12 other cars) and get nothing.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by lilelvis2000 View Post"Team orders" are not allowed.
McLaren were perfectly fair on their drivers IMO. If anything you have to say that Alonso lost it by crashing in Japan, and Hamilton lost it by crashing in the pit lane entrance in China. Two unforced driver errors that were nothing to do with the team.
As for the point system, what are you going to do? Only reward points to the winner? I think there's an argument for allocating points all the way down to last place as the current system tends to be a bit unfair on the people that regularly finish 9th (thereby beating 12 other cars) and get nothing.
Leave a comment:
-
There was an interesting interview with David Coulthard earlier this season, when he was talking about the press coverage that the British drivers get at home. Lewis Hamilton said to him at one stage how hard it was, writing his autobiography. Coulthard responded "Surely it's easy - you've only got to cover one year?"
The way that the British media circus has moved on this year is impressive - last year they were talking about Button being sports personality of the year because he'd won his first race in about 100. Now - Jenson who??
Leave a comment:
-
Yes team orders are not allowed but if Alonso was any decent person he'd "crash" or something - it did not matter to him.
Leave a comment:
-
Alonso could have pulled over but how? "Team orders" are not allowed. And Hamilton was one lap down. Alonso would have had to come to complete stop on the penultimate lap.
Sorry but Maclaren buggered it with their nonsensical three stop race.
'course ITV (aka the Lewis Hamilton Racing fan club channel) couldn't understand that.
What makes my head shake is that Jenson Button has constantly made the wrong moves in his career. Two years ago he should have gone with Williams, now look where he is. A Passat could outrun the car he's in.
Leave a comment:
-
Alonso is the right ***t - he should have let Hamilton ahead in the last race since he was losing it anyway.
Leave a comment:
-
IMHO - Maclaren should have selected at the half way point one driver to win the championship and gone with it. Perhaps they did and it wasn't Alonso and he was about to spill the beans on the "spying" data...who knows.
Now the question is, where wil Alonso go? BMW? back to Renault (big mistake I figure), Williams?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TheFaQQer View PostI think it's him recognizing that the guy who wins the most races probably deserves to be champion, rather than the one who is more consistent and driving a car that has been ripped off from the leading competitor.
And Hamilton started the argument in Hungary by refusing to allow Alonso the clear run in qualifying, which is where the retaliation started.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
- Why limited company working could be back in vogue in 2025 Dec 16 09:45
- Expert Accounting for Contractors: Trusted by thousands Dec 12 14:47
Leave a comment: