• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Changed my sig

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Changed my sig"

Collapse

  • ThomasSoerensen
    replied
    Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
    171 Appearances between 1998 and 2003

    But it's spelt Sørensen.

    Of course - you might remember this
    My name is spelt exactly the same as the Sunderland guys name. Only I am slightly older so I call him a copy cat.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheFaQQer
    replied
    Originally posted by SallyAnne View Post
    Is everyone planning on watching the glorious toon tonight? I have strategically taken tomorrow off work
    What are they doing?

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by threaded View Post
    No no, you should all be watching the Jagtvej 69 Politics video instead!
    Surely this is blatant advertising?
    Last edited by Churchill; 22 October 2007, 10:58. Reason: Original response was cruel - accurate but cruel.

    Leave a comment:


  • threaded
    replied
    Originally posted by SallyAnne View Post
    No - that memory is wiped clean from my mind!

    Is everyone planning on watching the glorious toon tonight? I have strategically taken tomorrow off work
    No no, you should all be watching the Jagtvej 69 Politics video instead!

    Leave a comment:


  • SallyAnne
    replied
    Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
    171 Appearances between 1998 and 2003

    But it's spelt Sørensen.

    Of course - you might remember this
    No - that memory is wiped clean from my mind!

    Is everyone planning on watching the glorious toon tonight? I have strategically taken tomorrow off work

    Leave a comment:


  • TheFaQQer
    replied
    Originally posted by SallyAnne View Post
    Didn't you used to play for Sunderland?
    171 Appearances between 1998 and 2003

    But it's spelt Sørensen.

    Of course - you might remember this

    Sørensen gained legendary status in Sunderland in 2001, when he saved a penalty kick from Alan Shearer in the dying moments of the game, to preserve a valuable win over arch rivals and neighbouring club Newcastle United.

    Leave a comment:


  • ThomasSoerensen
    replied
    Originally posted by SallyAnne View Post
    Didn't you used to play for Sunderland?
    The fiddle? Yes.

    Leave a comment:


  • SallyAnne
    replied
    Originally posted by ThomasSoerensen View Post
    Yes. Saw the video as well. Could not make sense of it. Could not see how I could profit from it. Forgot about it.
    Didn't you used to play for Sunderland?

    Leave a comment:


  • ThomasSoerensen
    replied
    Originally posted by threaded View Post
    Yes. Saw the video as well. Could not make sense of it. Could not see how I could profit from it. Forgot about it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Spacecadet
    replied
    Is this your comment?


    threaded0dk
    Yes, there is a disdain for literal meanings given to objects and focus is rather on the undertones, the poetic undercurrents present. Not only do they give emphasis to the poetic undercurrents, but also to the connotations and the overtones which exist in ambiguous relationships to the visual images.

    Leave a comment:


  • KathyWoolfe
    replied
    What's all this about?

    Leave a comment:


  • DS23
    replied
    yeszzzzzzzzzzz eh? what?

    Leave a comment:


  • cailin maith
    replied
    Me neither!

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    No. Next.

    Leave a comment:


  • Moose423956
    replied
    Originally posted by threaded View Post
    Notice what?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X