- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Should I stay or should I go?
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Should I stay or should I go?"
Collapse
-
No, I don't think we would be a good fitOriginally posted by TheFaQQer View PostI thought you were asking him out!!
Leave a comment:
-
I was just reminding him, he was saying something he knew nothing about. Was I being too polite.Originally posted by TheFaQQer View PostPlease tell me that wasn't an invite to SAS??
Leave a comment:
-
Of course, "Ball's in your court" should have had a lower case 'b', unless it was the start of the sentence, or you were pointing out that someone by the name of Ball was in the court.Originally posted by TheFaQQer View PostFor reference, it should have been "Ball's" unless you are using more than one ball, in which case "balls in your court" would have been OK but slightly strange.
Unless, of course, you are looking for balls in your court, in which case...
Pedantry at it's finest.
Leave a comment:
-
Thank you kind SirOriginally posted by TheFaQQer View PostFor reference, it should have been "Ball's" unless you are using more than one ball, in which case "balls in your court" would have been OK but slightly strange.
Unless, of course, you are looking for balls in your court, in which case...
Leave a comment:
-
For reference, it should have been "Ball's" unless you are using more than one ball, in which case "balls in your court" would have been OK but slightly strange.Originally posted by alreadypacked View PostBall in your court then, or should that be balls. Where is FaQQer when you need him
Unless, of course, you are looking for balls in your court, in which case...
Leave a comment:
-
How many times do you reckon AtW has voted for himself?
And while we're at it where was the - I have now slept with a real live female person so now I can come back and tell us all how it's done properly option, or have you still not got there?
Leave a comment:
-
You have yet to find outOriginally posted by sasguru View PostShe likes rough, nasty men.
Leave a comment:
-
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Should a new limited company not making much money pay a salary/dividend? Yesterday 08:43
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Feb 12 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Feb 11 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47


Leave a comment: