Originally posted by Spartacus
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Doomed I tell yer!!!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Doomed I tell yer!!!"
Collapse
-
As she wasn't wearing a seatbelt she wouldn't have decelerated at all when the car came to a sudden stop. Now when she hit the armoured glass at the front of the car, maybe...Originally posted by DimPrawn View PostIt wasn't the speed or the pillar that killed her, more the rapid deceleration I feel.
Perhaps New Labour can bring out some carefully planned legislation to help save us all from rapid deceleration events.
Leave a comment:
-
It wasn't the speed or the pillar that killed her, more the rapid deceleration I feel.
Perhaps New Labour can bring out some carefully planned legislation to help save us all from rapid deceleration events.
Leave a comment:
-
You might be onto something there! Very suspicious having a concrete pillar in a tunnel.Originally posted by TheFaQQer View PostYes - I think she died because the driver was drunk, she wasn't wearing a seatbelt, and they crashed into a concrete pillar at high speed.
It's that last crucial detail that makes the difference, I feel.
Leave a comment:
-
Yes - I think she died because the driver was drunk, she wasn't wearing a seatbelt, and they crashed into a concrete pillar at high speed.Originally posted by Spartacus View PostIs there really anyone (other than al Fayed) who seriously, genuinely believes she died for any reason other than the driver was drunk and she wasn't wearing a seatbelt?
It's that last crucial detail that makes the difference, I feel.
Mind you, no doubt the readers of the Daily Heil will feel differently.
Leave a comment:
-
Is there really anyone (other than al Fayed) who seriously, genuinely believes she died for any reason other than the driver was drunk and she wasn't wearing a seatbelt?
Leave a comment:
-
Are they planning on demonstrating it by caning it through there at 120 with a p1ssed up driver? That's the only way they'll be able to work it out properly.
Leave a comment:
-
Oh, the irony!
"The vehicle's wheel trim shot off"
Another MI5 / MI6 / N@zi plot then. I blame the Egyptians.
Leave a comment:
-
Doomed I tell yer!!!
Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Today 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Yesterday 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36

Leave a comment: