Reply to: Time to rewrite History

[shelby68]

And let's not forget the contributions of giant alien lizards...

Too Much David Icke!

[GreenerGrass]

My point exactly. If these evil b@astards pulled the punch there must have been a very very good reason. Possibly the same reason that would have prevented Europe becoming a nuclear wastland by 1950.

Hmmm....
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHU407A.html


Our biggest problem had they invaded, as in the rest of Europe, was civilian reprisals.
There were various special units which would have gone to ground to wage a guerrilla war against occupiers, but could they continue fighting if the Germans had machine gunned an entire village each time?

Then again, when you look at the numbers of our forces its highly doubtful they would have got far from the coast without bogging down.

http://www.historyplace.com/speeches/churchill-hour.htm
Incredible speech by Churchill.

[Spartacus]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canard_(aeronautics)

?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duck_%28food%29

[EternalOptimist]

[QUOTE=zeitghost;308256]Allegedly because Adolf got himself gassed in WWI...

QUOTE]


Possibly

anyway thats enough history for me. I'm off to try to find out where dba_bloke lives

[Spartacus]

There's only one place for a canard...

Yes, on my plate with orange sauce.

[Churchill]

Nope.

We weren't on their side... it's an evil canard.

There's only one place for a canard...

[DBA_bloke]

Of course, but have you ever wondered why the nazis didnt tip their rockets with chemical or biological when they had the upper hand.

They had the chance to pepper us with anthrax, f&m, blue tongue, dba_bloke vitriol etc. Why didnt they ? And then later, why didnt we ?

You tell us, professor Mick Feckin' Aston!

[EternalOptimist]

at heart, they were nice people who were just misunderstood?

My point exactly. If these evil b@astards pulled the punch there must have been a very very good reason. Possibly the same reason that would have prevented Europe becoming a nuclear wastland by 1950.

[Spartacus]

Of course, but have you ever wondered why the nazis didnt tip their rockets with chemical or biological when they had the upper hand.

They had the chance to pepper us with anthrax, f&m, blue tongue, dba_bloke vitriol etc. Why didnt they ? And then later, why didnt we ?

It never occurred to them? They forgot?

[Dundeegeorge]

Was ikt because

at heart, they were nice people who were just misunderstood?

Damn, how fo you edit subjects, that looks like ti was posted by Popey, damn it!

[EternalOptimist]

Nah.

Place would have become a nuclear wasteland by about 1950...

Of course, but have you ever wondered why the nazis didnt tip their rockets with chemical or biological when they had the upper hand.

They had the chance to pepper us with anthrax, f&m, blue tongue, dba_bloke vitriol etc. Why didnt they ? And then later, why didnt we ?

[DBA_bloke]

DBA bloke, I dont mean to be critical but it might be a good idea if you were not to post whilst you are doing drugs

Admonishment accepted. Especially as it comes from one with years of first-hand experience.

[EternalOptimist]

History degree: bog roll, and you sooooo know it, too. Try it on with someone who doesn't see through your flimsy, floral nightie of a façade.

Bumhole.

DBA bloke, I dont mean to be critical but it might be a good idea if you were not to post whilst you are doing drugs

[DBA_bloke]

My degree is in history so I know the difference between the Counter factual conditional concept interpretation of history (me) and the purely speculative assertion(you)

In other words my approach is 'what might have happened if the situation had been changed in this way'

Your approach is 'This is what would have happened anyway'

History degree: bog roll, and you sooooo know it, too. Try it on with someone who doesn't see through your flimsy, floral nightie of a façade.

Bumhole.

[EternalOptimist]

To quote a twat:
"You think ????????

Lets try sticking to the facts. You seem to be quite good at this rewriting history malarky yourself "


You bumhole.

My degree is in history so I know the difference between the Counter factual conditional concept interpretation of history (me) and the purely speculative assertion(you)

In other words my approach is 'what might have happened if the situation had been changed in this way'

Your approach is 'This is what would have happened anyway'