• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Another Scientist Blasting Climate Models"

Collapse

  • wendigo100
    replied
    Originally posted by zathras View Post
    Which just about demonstrates why one should ignore the Stern Report. It started from the proposition to raise taxes and then sought to back that up. Which is no doubt why the only answer it seemed to come up with was raising taxes (rather than say tax breaks to encourage people to convert their homes and offices to renewable forms of energy)
    Agreed. Nothing is as it seems with New Labour.

    Leave a comment:


  • zathras
    replied
    Originally posted by Sysman View Post
    One niggle about the Stern Report though:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicholas_Stern

    "After his time working for the World Bank, Stern was recruited by Gordon Brown, then Chancellor of the Exchequer, to work for the British government where, in 2003, he became second permanent secretary at H.M. Treasury, initially with responsibility for public finances, and head of the Government Economic Service."

    Which just about demonstrates why one should ignore the Stern Report. It started from the proposition to raise taxes and then sought to back that up. Which is no doubt why the only answer it seemed to come up with was raising taxes (rather than say tax breaks to encourage people to convert their homes and offices to renewable forms of energy)

    Leave a comment:


  • Ardesco
    replied
    Originally posted by Bagpuss View Post
    Because a man who invented a vacum cleaner says so? who next Jade Goody?
    And what technology does he use??

    Millions of little cyclones!!!!!

    See he's utilising weather patterns in his technology!!! Not so smug now are we Bagopuss

    Leave a comment:


  • Bagpuss
    replied
    Hang on I'm just writing one on Wikipedia

    Leave a comment:


  • Sysman
    replied
    Originally posted by Bagpuss View Post
    Ahh Wikipedia, you can't handle the truth!
    Citation please.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bagpuss
    replied
    Ahh Wikipedia, you can't handle the truth!

    Leave a comment:


  • Sysman
    replied
    One niggle about the Stern Report though:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicholas_Stern

    "After his time working for the World Bank, Stern was recruited by Gordon Brown, then Chancellor of the Exchequer, to work for the British government where, in 2003, he became second permanent secretary at H.M. Treasury, initially with responsibility for public finances, and head of the Government Economic Service."

    Leave a comment:


  • Bagpuss
    replied
    Because a man who invented a vacum cleaner says so? who next Jade Goody?

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Not terribly bright, are yer?

    Leave a comment:


  • Ardesco
    started a topic Another Scientist Blasting Climate Models

    Another Scientist Blasting Climate Models

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/08...mate_heresies/

    More reason to not belive the tree hugging hippy agenda

Working...
X