Originally posted by Cowboy Bob
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: No Longer Need Agreement In Writing
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "No Longer Need Agreement In Writing"
Collapse
-
It's always been true. But I think adding the magic words "subject to contract" and being sure not to exchange anything of pecuniary benefit (if talking face to face) means you can't be held to a verbal agreement.
-
If you've got a secure recording system attached to your phone, then I don't see why not.Originally posted by The Lone GunmanDoes this also mean that when the scrote tells me he can get me 20 quid an hour over the rate offered i can hold him to it?
Leave a comment:
-
Does this also mean that when the scrote tells me he can get me 20 quid an hour over the rate offered i can hold him to it?
Leave a comment:
-
Humph. My word is my bond. And I'm not an Englishman.Originally posted by The Lone GunmanAs an Englishman I see no problem. My word has always been my bond.
Leave a comment:
-
The point to remember about this case is that it's based on the notes taken (presumably by others present in the room) when the conversation took place (again presumably over speakerphone - no such deal would be made unanimously by one single person).
If a pimp wanted to pull a similar stunt, he/she would have to make it clear right at the start, that the telephone conversation was being recorded - if not it's not admissible in court.
Leave a comment:
-
And me as well. I never agree to anything on the phone that I'm not prepared to follow through on. The reason I posted the link is that we get a lot of posts on here along the lines of "I agreed to take on a contract but a better one has come up. If I haven't signed the original contract, can I turn it down and do the second instead?"Originally posted by The Lone GunmanAs an Englishman I see no problem. My word has always been my bond.
This new decision muddies those waters, that's all.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by The Lone GunmanAs an Englishman I see no problem. My word has always been my bond.
Leave a comment:
-
As an Englishman I see no problem. My word has always been my bond.
Leave a comment:
-
What is the proof required?
Does the phone call have to be recorded or is it enough for me to say "Cowboy Bob phoned me and offered me £10K cash for an acre of land on the Moon. I sent him the deeds and he sent me no cash."
?
Leave a comment:
-
No Longer Need Agreement In Writing
Be careful what you agree to on the phone with a pimp...
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/07...deals_binding/Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Today 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Yesterday 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Jan 28 08:11
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Jan 27 08:41
- Contractors, a £25million crackdown on rogue company directors is coming Jan 26 05:02
- How to run a contractor limited company — efficiently. Part one: software Jan 22 23:31

Leave a comment: