She's on tonight? Must remember to miss that....
Or was it last night or tomorrow?
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: £1000/hr contracts
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "£1000/hr contracts"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by BonkersIt's because I'm worth it.
Could have waited until after lunch to post couldn't you....
Leave a comment:
-
Speak for yourself ... I'm worth every penny.Originally posted by zeitghostAnd we thought we were greedy...
Leave a comment:
-
£1000/hr contracts
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-23402703-details/'Meteoric%20salary%20rises'%20fuel%20%C3%BD%C3%BD1 ,000-an-hour%20cost%20of%20a%20lawyer%20in%20the%20City/article.do
Top lawyers in the big City firms are now charging up to £1,000 per hour.
A survey of in-house lawyers, who often use outside law firms for their work, found that more than two thirds had been charged or quoted fees that were between six and 10 per cent higher than last year.
Legal fees cost on average of between £500 and £700 an hour, but 36 per cent of those questioned by Legal Week magazine had been quoted or charged more than £700, including four per cent who had come across rates above £1,000.
No firm would admit to charging hourly rates of £1,000 an hour, but partners said instructions agreed on flat fees could be equivalent.
The results of the survey underline the premium charged by firms in London. One City partner at a US firm said: "Transaction size and complexity is increasing and there have been meteoric salary rises for associates, so it is no surprise that rates are up."
Some 18 per cent of those surveyed said they believed the rising costs of salaries and partner profits were being passed on entirely to clients.
Josh Bayliss, general counsel at the Virgin Group, added that rates are being driven by competition: "The best people are in high demand."Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Should a new limited company not making much money pay a salary/dividend? Today 08:43
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Yesterday 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Feb 11 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47

Leave a comment: