Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
"safe" as in tame. He's had the treasury for so long and built it up so much that it's basically his, and he wants to keep running it from number 10.
If that were the case, then his mate Balls would be the man for the job (same way that John Major was Thatcher's chancellor). I'm not sure that Darling is tame - he just has a reputation for being put into difficult departments and calming things down, before moving onto the next crisis department.
Maybe Gordon's just planning to sting us with something new this morning, before moving next door and having Darling clear the mess up...
dont know, but he has ****ed up every department he has had charge of. How he still holds a ministerial position is beyond me.
He's generally regarded as a "safe pair of hands", so ends up taking over departments where there has been trouble. For example, taking over Transport from Byers.
Makes me wonder what's coming from the Treasury, if they feel that they need to put him in there now...
Leave a comment: