Originally posted by Clippy
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Naming/Shaming absent fathers
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Naming/Shaming absent fathers"
Collapse
-
You could be onto something here.Originally posted by Causus DeliI paid 50% more than the maximum laid down by the CSA, they were never involved, I love my kids * shock horror dad loves kids *. 7 years, the house and all that dough, she now moves teenagers out because new dad doesn't like them in his newly acquired house (you know, mine). Real dad picks up bill again. Still she rages about what a tight fisted Father I am. Name and shame these women.
Perhaps you care to get the ball rolling...
Leave a comment:
-
That's because the call centre is staffed by divorced women!Originally posted by Swamp ThingDid you know that if a father phones up CSA/C-MEC and challenges a payment calculation, the first thing the operative does is to mark him up on the system as a troublemaker? From then on in it's all uphill for the father. With such systemic prejudice abound, these latest developments come as no surprise...
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DodgyAgentI dont really understand why she left you in the first place? who is her new man? El Duder by any chance?
Leave a comment:
-
I dont really understand why she left you in the first place? who is her new man? El Duder by any chance?Originally posted by Causus DeliI paid 50% more than the maximum laid down by the CSA, they were never involved, I love my kids * shock horror dad loves kids *. 7 years, the house and all that dough, she now moves teenagers out because new dad doesn't like them in his newly acquired house (you know, mine). Real dad picks up bill again. Still she rages about what a tight fisted Father I am. Name and shame these women.
Leave a comment:
-
If we can name and shame absent fathers...why won't they do it for paedos???
Leave a comment:
-
I paid 50% more than the maximum laid down by the CSA, they were never involved, I love my kids * shock horror dad loves kids *. 7 years, the house and all that dough, she now moves teenagers out because new dad doesn't like them in his newly acquired house (you know, mine). Real dad picks up bill again. Still she rages about what a tight fisted Father I am. Name and shame these women.
Leave a comment:
-
Going too far. C-MEC (and its previous lame duck incarnation the CSA) cannot calculate payments correctly in the first place. They cock up direct debit payments, they harass fathers unnecessarily. And as for naming and shaming, bring it on. This will backfire on them as it will ironically publicise the crappy way in which they 'have a go' at fathers. C-MEC is incapable of looking at cases individually and deciding accordingly. It's easier and more cost-effective for them to start off with "All absent fathers are crap and we'll fleece them accordingly".Originally posted by SizeZero
Did you know that if a father phones up CSA/C-MEC and challenges a payment calculation, the first thing the operative does is to mark him up on the system as a troublemaker? From then on in it's all uphill for the father. With such systemic prejudice abound, these latest developments come as no surprise...
Leave a comment:
-
Two to make an agreement and one to break it.Originally posted by Maxamusthis is redicilous.
It takes 2 to tango!
Leave a comment:
-
Some don't get a full choice in when the little ones arrive. Protect oneself boys. Evil women need naming and shaming, bringing in offspring to your vendetta is child cruelty and you should be on a charge.Last edited by Causus Deli; 6 June 2007, 12:25.
Leave a comment:
-
Innocent until proven guilty, some women are evil, vindictive bitches, just because we ran off with a more sportier, better looking model.
Leave a comment:
-
Naming/Shaming absent fathers
Click the pretty link
Deserved or going too far?The Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission (C-MEC) will be able to deduct cash direct from non-payers' bank accounts, as well as take away their passports and impose curfews on them if they fail to support their children.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Leave a comment: