Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
As anyone that has worked in a Gov't paid contract will tell you, as a contractor you love it, but as a tax-payer you hate it, because of the incompetence and the waste. A year ago, the NHS through Accenture were paying an army of contractors up in Leeds and other sites that were doing practically nothing for months. Now they can't afford to pay the front-line doctors and nurses. I'm worried though that, as a result of all the past failures, there may be a lot less public IT work in future. What do you think?
But how much were Accenture actually being paid for their idle contractors? They made a considerable loss on the contract before they pulled out.
As anyone that has worked in a Gov't paid contract will tell you, as a contractor you love it, but as a tax-payer you hate it, because of the incompetence and the waste. A year ago, the NHS through Accenture were paying an army of contractors up in Leeds and other sites that were doing practically nothing for months. Now they can't afford to pay the front-line doctors and nurses. I'm worried though that, as a result of all the past failures, there may be a lot less public IT work in future. What do you think?
Government "inititives" will ensure that the work will not dry up, plus a number of gvt agencies are self funding anyway...
As anyone that has worked in a Gov't paid contract will tell you, as a contractor you love it, but as a tax-payer you hate it, because of the incompetence and the waste. A year ago, the NHS through Accenture were paying an army of contractors up in Leeds and other sites that were doing practically nothing for months. Now they can't afford to pay the front-line doctors and nurses. I'm worried though that, as a result of all the past failures, there may be a lot less public IT work in future. What do you think?
I didn't say it was all the fault of business users , 6 of one and half a dozen of the other IMHO.
Either way just lumping it onto the IT dept sounds like standard manager bullsh*t when they realise thier project is going tits up. Can't be anything to do with thier mis-management can it....
Classic us and them.
If it's run by IT then it's their fault, and the if it's a business inititive then it's the business managers fault...
... sooner or later these managers might realise they actually work for the same company...
Nothing to do with the software departments inability to effectively capture the requirements then, eh?
I didn't say it was all the fault of business users , 6 of one and half a dozen of the other IMHO.
Either way just lumping it onto the IT dept sounds like standard manager bullsh*t when they realise thier project is going tits up. Can't be anything to do with thier mis-management can it....
Leave a comment: