• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "conspiracy theories about July 7"

Collapse

  • Mailman
    replied
    Originally posted by Cooperinliverp00l
    i love conspiracy theories.
    This usually goes hand in hand with the inability to think for yourself.

    Like how a building opposite the twin towers which was the home to secret service collapsed shortly after the towers did with the conspiracy that they blew up the towers in a controlled explosion to provent major damage if the towers went sideways and then to hide all evidence this building was also demolished.
    So ask yourself this. If you were trying to hide evidence how would you do it? Demolish a building or remove that evidence and destroy it securely at a secret "sensitive information destruction facility the alians gave us"?

    It strikes me that bringing a building down isnt the best way to guarantee the total and complete and utter destruction of some evidence you want to hide away. Then again, maybe they were trying to get rid of Hoffa's body once and for all?

    Even the footage of both towers and building number 7 (i think it was known as) all looked like controlled explosions. What is very interesting is how you can see lower down on twin towers small explosions as the tower crumbles.
    Just because something looks like something doesnt mean its something does it? I mean look around here...most people look like intelligent people yet this thread has shown the lie that statement is

    Again, just a little bit of critical thinking should help you out here. Where was all the wiring required to bring a building down? Farken hell...imagine the law suite of some fat f8cker tripped over all that demo cord and hurt himself because he was carrying super hot McDonalds coffee!

    Also, where was all the preperation work to weaken the structural supports? None...then again some calculations for the use of thermite had the requirement amount in the hundreds of pounds NOT to mention the fact that thermite cant be used vertically!

    Can't wait till we get some theories on this one.
    Hehehe

    Our thoughts are with the family and freinds of all those who have been caught by the attacks and hope that they get some answers soon.
    Depends on what answers you want. If the answer you dont want is "the attacks were carried out by religion of peace advocates" then you will be waiting a long time for an alternative "truth".

    Mailman

    Leave a comment:


  • wendigo100
    replied
    Originally posted by Euro-commuter
    Studies of the real cost of ID cards are being shredded as we speak....
    True. I'm wondering what they'll do if/when they lose their appeal and the law finally says they must hand them over. Who gets arrested?

    Leave a comment:


  • wendigo100
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost
    Indeed.

    Cunning Plan #235.5
    Is that one with or without the aid of our government?

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by The Farmer
    Makes me feel like a prole
    If you've got a spare, can I have it?

    Leave a comment:


  • VectraMan
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost
    So long as you're at Ground Zero, it doesn't hurt at all when a nuke goes off... just that microsecond of feeling slightly warm.
    On the plus side, a good nuclear war will stop people going on about global warming. A bit of global warming might help us get through the nuclear winter.

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by The Farmer
    Just read the book and found it to be very prophetic.

    Day by day I feel we are moving closer towards this Orwellian nightmare.

    Makes me feel like a prole
    Yes, it's all going to plan here at miniluv

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by Rantor
    Of course, you would say that

    How is the weather down in Vauxhall today?
    Pretty much the same as where you are.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mailman
    replied
    Originally posted by maximus
    I'd never heard of Operation Northwood ...scary stuff
    And why was it not used? Because it would be too complicated to pull off.

    Mailman

    Leave a comment:


  • maximus
    replied
    Originally posted by AlfredJPruffock
    I find it amusing to hear people pour scorn on conspiracy theories when in fact we went to war on the basis of a (false) conspiracy thoery - that Iraq was in possesion on WMDs.

    If you doubt that the Governments do get involved in conspiracies then I suggest you Google on Operation Northwood and Gulf of Tonkin for some rather interesting examples of what Governemnts can get up to ...
    I'd never heard of Operation Northwood ...scary stuff
    Destroying an unmanned drone masquerading as a commercial aircraft supposedly full of "college students off on a holiday". This proposal was the one supported by the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
    Staging a "terror campaign", including the "real or simulated" sinking of Cuban refugees

    Leave a comment:


  • Bagpuss
    replied
    and how about the multiple conspiracies to assasinate Castro?

    All above board and not state sponsored murder at all

    Leave a comment:


  • AlfredJPruffock
    replied
    I find it amusing to hear people pour scorn on conspiracy theories when in fact we went to war on the basis of a (false) conspiracy thoery - that Iraq was in possesion on WMDs.

    If you doubt that the Governments do get involved in conspiracies then I suggest you Google on Operation Northwood and Gulf of Tonkin for some rather interesting examples of what Governemnts can get up to ...

    Leave a comment:


  • The Farmer
    replied
    Originally posted by maximus
    All very 1984!
    Just read the book and found it to be very prophetic.

    Day by day I feel we are moving closer towards this Orwellian nightmare.

    Makes me feel like a prole

    Leave a comment:


  • SallyAnne
    replied
    Muslims are the least of our worries....looks like the Russians are the most likely to knack us now (if today's Independant is anything to go by!)

    I wonder what hurts more - being blown up by a "terrorist", or being nuked?

    Leave a comment:


  • Cowboy Bob
    replied
    This message is hidden because angusglover is on your ignore list.
    Another racist for my growing list...

    Leave a comment:


  • Ardesco
    replied
    Originally posted by maximus
    The Irish were pretty successful
    My point exactly.

    If there is a big evil group of muslim terrorists plotting to blow us all up why haven't they done it again? Lets face it, it can't be that hard to get hold of something that will injure somebody, walk into a public place and use it...

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X