- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: agency ethical dilemma?
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "agency ethical dilemma?"
Collapse
-
Choose whichever option stops them coming and biting you in the arse in a few months/years time...
-
Please explain ? I can't believe an agency has left themselves in a position were you are going to be able to claim twice their cut without one hell of a fight. What appear to be legal arguments in your favour when dealing with agencies are often irrelevant as they'll get nasty quickly and will stoop a lot lower than you in any fight.Originally posted by bobhopeI am in the unusual position of being able to sting my agency. Normally, I wouldn't dream of doing so, but this particular agency have been playing dirty tricks. Question is: how much should I take them for?
1) The amount they ripped me off by?
2) Their commission for the entire contract?
3) The maximum possible (about twice (2))?
A few years ago, I had a similar opportunity, but the agency then were playing fair so I didn't pursue.
I recommend reading your contracts very closely - it can be profitable :-)
Leave a comment:
-
I think you'll find most folk in here woul dopt for number 3 especially if they have been unscrupulous.
Leave a comment:
-
What sort of dirty tricks?Originally posted by bobhopeI am in the unusual position of being able to sting my agency. Normally, I wouldn't dream of doing so, but this particular agency have been playing dirty tricks.
If you want opinions from here, it would help to know how naughty the agency has been, in order to recommend the correct
Leave a comment:
-
Whatever would clear your conscience and overdraft. That's probably (3).
Go get them tigger!
Leave a comment:
-
(1) leaves you with the moral high ground.
Option (4) is to name and shame.
Leave a comment:
-
agency ethical dilemma?
I am in the unusual position of being able to sting my agency. Normally, I wouldn't dream of doing so, but this particular agency have been playing dirty tricks. Question is: how much should I take them for?
1) The amount they ripped me off by?
2) Their commission for the entire contract?
3) The maximum possible (about twice (2))?
A few years ago, I had a similar opportunity, but the agency then were playing fair so I didn't pursue.
I recommend reading your contracts very closely - it can be profitable :-)Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Umbrella, PEO/GPP, or salaried EOR. Which is up 153% in 2026? Today 08:43
- Outside IR35 isn’t making a comeback in 2026/27 — it’s something more complex Yesterday 04:55
- Why contractors keep putting off their pension (and why I'm one of them) Aug 4 02:43
- HMRC loan charge settlement offer: 3 things to check before you sign Aug 3 07:41
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Jul 31 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Jul 30 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59

Leave a comment: