Originally posted by Numptycorner
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Poverty
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Poverty"
Collapse
-
No, it is based on a percentage of the Median income. Those in poverty may be driving Porsches, but if they are on less than 60% median income, they are poverty stricken. Poor bastards.
-
It is based on the Median income.
Solution is simple. When the legal min wage becomes the Median income, there will be no more poverty in Britain. Of course, for this to happen, everyone must be on Min Wage. Welcome to Utopia.
Leave a comment:
-
At least they are using the median in the definition, to avoid skewed mean earnings. However, what is poverty? Not being able to afford Sky?Originally posted by lilelvis2000True, I got confused with mean.
as perhaps half the media did.
Leave a comment:
-
True, I got confused with mean.Originally posted by NumptycornerThe top earners don't really effect median earnings
as perhaps half the media did.
Leave a comment:
-
The top earners don't really effect median earningsOriginally posted by lilelvis2000remove the top 5% of wage earners from the country. Or tax them to death.
Leave a comment:
-
remove the top 5% of wage earners from the country. Or tax them to death.
Leave a comment:
-
Devalue the pound, pay people 10 times as much and absolute poverty is no longer.
Leave a comment:
-
Poverty
Now, can someone please explain what would have to happen to UK incomes for everyone to be lifted out of poverty???Relative poverty is calculated as the proportion and number of people living on less than 60% of the current median income.
Absolute poverty describes those who are living below 60% of the median income from 1998-99.
The only thing I can think of is kill everyone? Then no one is in poverty?Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Today 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Yesterday 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Jan 28 08:11
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Jan 27 08:41
- Contractors, a £25million crackdown on rogue company directors is coming Jan 26 05:02
- How to run a contractor limited company — efficiently. Part one: software Jan 22 23:31
- Forget February as an MSC contractor seeking clarity, and maybe forget fairness altogether Jan 22 19:57
- What contractors should take from Honest Payroll Ltd’s failure Jan 21 07:05
- HMRC tax avoidance list ‘proves promoters’ nothing-to-lose mentality’ Jan 20 09:17
- Digital ID won’t be required for Right To Work, but more compulsion looms Jan 19 07:41

Leave a comment: