• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: 300 movie

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "300 movie"

Collapse

  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    The Spartans were not alone at the battle but they formed the core of the defence. The elephants were not much use because the Greeks formed a spear hedge , or phalanx, and did not have a flank for cavalry, elephants, chariots or light troops to operate on. It was a perfect set up for the defenders.

    The greek phalanx, or block of spearmen was a formidible fighting machine but it had severe limitations, at this battle the limitations were never exposed until the Persians found a way around the position. In addition to the narrow pass the Greeks also had a low wall to stand behind, which was a further obstacle to elephants or chariots.

    The best way to defeat the phalanx was the Roman short swordsman. The Roman units were smaller, more flexible, could operate more independantly and had a method of recycling tired and wounded from the front ranks to the rear.

    The main way that casualties were inflicted in the ancient world was when one side broke and ran, this was why the Persians could not afford to try to wear the Greeks down by attrition, their poor morale units would break after a few minute, assuming they even made contact, they would then be slaughtered.

    In warfare there is a scissors, paper, stone principle. Spearmen are good against cavalry, swordsmen are good against spearmen, cavalry are good against swordsmen etc etc.



    Leave a comment:


  • TheOmegaMan
    replied
    How terrible to be named after an XML parser - your parents must have hated you.

    Leave a comment:


  • Xerxes
    replied
    Please stop taking my name in vain, otherwise a few Immortals will pop 'round for a chat.

    Leave a comment:


  • threaded
    replied
    Originally posted by Gibbon
    A less famous before infinitely more important battle was the battle of Marathon...
    This is true, but the Battle of Thermopylae was quite a cock-up, and as is the nature of politics/warfare the cock-ups get glamorized and made to appear more glorious than they were. Examples off the top of my head from WW2 are Dunkirk and Operation Market Garden aka A Bridge Too Far.

    Leave a comment:


  • wendigo100
    replied
    Anyone running the London Snickers today?

    Ah, you wouldn't be on here then, would you.

    Leave a comment:


  • Troll
    replied
    More commonly known today as the "Battle of Snickers"

    Leave a comment:


  • Gibbon
    replied
    A less famous before infinitely more important battle was the battle of Marathon in the which the Athenians completely trounced the Persians despite being overwhelmingly out numbered. Even the Spartans, visiting after the battle had to concede the Athenians had won a great victory and all by themselves. This was the battle that stopped the Persian advance into the rest of Greece. Without this victory there would have probalbly being no Greek golden age and it's influence on western culture.
    If your interested read Tom Hollands Persian Fire, a very good if a little lightweight introduction into this area.

    Leave a comment:


  • threaded
    replied
    Originally posted by wendigo100
    I thought they were all Thespians, even the Persians. Except for the Seejee-eyes of course.
    That was really very good. ROFLMAO.

    Leave a comment:


  • wendigo100
    replied
    Originally posted by threaded
    Well at the end there really were 300 Spartans, but also about 1000 Helots and a maybe similar but smaller number of Thespians.
    I thought they were all Thespians, even the Persians. Except for the Seejee-eyes of course.

    Leave a comment:


  • lilelvis2000
    replied
    Originally posted by Burdock
    Saw this last night, and really enjoyed it in a 'beating chest, heads flying' type way...

    Why didn't the 200,000 Persians all pile into the Spartans in one big mash?

    Why were those mega-elephants so ineffective? They just did a bit of trumpeting then fell off the cliff?

    Xerxes? What a faggot.

    Still, enjoyable 2 hours
    I preferred the original movie.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sysman
    replied
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Thermopylae

    Leave a comment:


  • threaded
    replied
    Originally posted by Burdock
    and the massive elephants?!?!
    Of no use in such a battle.

    Leave a comment:


  • Burdock
    replied
    and the massive elephants?!?!

    Leave a comment:


  • threaded
    replied
    Well at the end there really were 300 Spartans, but also about 1000 Helots and a maybe similar but smaller number of Thespians.

    You must remember that the Spartans in formation were the WMD of their day. IIRC the first Persian attack was 10,000 men who all died in exchange for only 2 Spartan dead.

    Leave a comment:


  • PRC1964
    replied
    Originally posted by where did my id go?
    wasnt it to do with the local geography? The spartans had a damned good position. Didnt some of the persians get drowned trying to get round ?

    Where are all the public school bods who can quote from the sources ? Dunno what this board is coming to these days.
    Give it 10 minutes so that Threaded can do some Googling and he'll be in here claiming to have offered the Spartans advice but they were too tight to pay for it.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X