Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
It is the homebuying masses who have expended the labour, not homeowners. Those who have merely held on to a property (or indeed exchanged) through the rampant house price inflation of recent years have profited from the labour of others.
Yes of course. Those who hold no debt are blessed.
This is called a 'debt harvest'. Wealth is neither created nor destroyed but transferred. Therefore all the labour that was expended by the home-owning masses has resulted in no net gain for them because after reposession they are left with nothing. Most of it actually gets transferred to those who buy at the bottom, with the gatekeepers to capital (i.e. the banks) taking their cut on every transaction.
It is the homebuying masses who have expended the labour, not homeowners. Those who have merely held on to a property (or indeed exchanged) through the rampant house price inflation of recent years have profited from the labour of others.
Not only in the UK there is lot of credit available in most of the countries. I wonder where all this low interest money is coming from .
Some comes from Japan, but ultimately money is simply created out of thin air. Of course the more money is created the less it is worth, just like any other commodity - this is inflation. Of course if you work for money this is a problem.
Are banks deliberately over-lending to cause a crash and position themselves for it?
They will end up owning a hell of a lot of property, and this time they might be planning to hold on to repossessions and expand their own BTL businesses.
This has been nagging away at me for ages, but Shirley not?
This is called a 'debt harvest'. Wealth is neither created nor destroyed but transferred. Therefore all the labour that was expended by the home-owning masses has resulted in no net gain for them because after reposession they are left with nothing. Most of it actually gets transferred to those who buy at the bottom, with the gatekeepers to capital (i.e. the banks) taking their cut on every transaction.
Wrong, the internet is probably the most valuable source of info now. Of course, you need to know how to filter.
If you're relying on mainstream media, BBC, etc. and financial advisers, then you are up the proverbial creek. The US subprime debacle is only now being widely reported in the mainstream, but it's been discussed for years now.
People get upset if you use the word crash. I prefer 'correction'
Milan re: source of the money. It's the YCT innit? (Actually I only found out a couple of months ago, the SFCT is also massive)
But the media gets the message out to the masses. If the message is panic then people panic. The first rule of economic behaviour is expectations/consumer confidence
If London is the catalyst, why did prices rise double digit in the Midlands and North West while London was stagnating in 2003 (price falls). Surely that should have lead to prices falling elsewhere?
As others have said the key is when the money supply contracts, which it allways does at some point.
Wrong, the internet is probably the most valuable source of info now. Of course, you need to know how to filter.
If you're relying on mainstream media, BBC, etc. and financial advisers, then you are up the proverbial creek. The US subprime debacle is only now being widely reported in the mainstream, but it's been discussed for years now.
People get upset if you use the word crash. I prefer 'correction'
Milan re: source of the money. It's the YCT innit? (Actually I only found out a couple of months ago, the SFCT is also massive)
Are banks deliberately over-lending to cause a crash and position themselves for it?
They will end up owning a hell of a lot of property, and this time they might be planning to hold on to repossessions and expand their own BTL businesses.
This has been nagging away at me for ages, but Shirley not?
What's even worse is that people have less money to save, so depend on their homes to provide them with a pension.
One of the differences in this current property bubble, when compared to the one in the late 1980's, has been the demand for BTL by people using it as a pension due to the collapse of private sector final-salary pension schemes etc. BTL's target the same property that 1st time buyers go for hence less property available for 1st timers but more available to rent .
One of the unintended (?!!?) consequences of Gordon Browns pension tax reform made in 1997. Hope all you 1st time buyers appreciate this come election day lol
Leave a comment: