• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: wrong.com

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "wrong.com"

Collapse

  • wendigo100
    replied
    Whoops!

    http://forums.contractoruk.com/thread15162.html

    Leave a comment:


  • lilelvis2000
    replied
    Originally posted by The Lone Gunman
    This story feels so wrong, but that could just be the morals we have inherited. I understand about the genetics and throw backs etc.... but.....

    The disturbing thing is they do have a point. There is no restriction on unrelated folks who may have a disabled child.

    I was also disturbed by their attitude that their kids are normal.
    Given that people of the same sex can be married, and cousins who are married outside the UK are allowed to stay married - I can't see how this incest law has a leg to stand on.

    I too was perplexed when the parents claimed their children were fine when two have special needs.

    Leave a comment:


  • sunnysan
    replied
    Well

    Have you ever wondered why Prince Charles has such big ears?

    Leave a comment:


  • Burdock
    replied
    Reminds me of a joke I once heard:


    A bloke rings up his boss and says, "Sorry, I can't come in to work today as I'm sick..."

    "Well, how sick are you?" replies his boss.


    "Well, put it this way, I'm in bed with my sister"

    Leave a comment:


  • The Lone Gunman
    replied
    This story feels so wrong, but that could just be the morals we have inherited. I understand about the genetics and throw backs etc.... but.....

    The disturbing thing is they do have a point. There is no restriction on unrelated folks who may have a disabled child.

    I was also disturbed by their attitude that their kids are normal.

    Leave a comment:


  • Spacecadet
    replied
    Originally posted by EqualOpportunities
    My sister's 16, with blonde hair, long legs and big tits... Would that stand up in court?
    i'm sure "something" would stand up in court

    Leave a comment:


  • EqualOpportunities
    replied
    My sister's 16, with blonde hair, long legs and big tits... Would that stand up in court?

    Leave a comment:


  • Burdock
    replied
    it wasn't so bad a few years ago in Brookside...with that fit blonde lass...

    Leave a comment:


  • Gibbon
    replied
    Apparently this is common with siblings who are separated at birth and then meet again in adulthood.

    Leave a comment:


  • Spacecadet
    started a topic wrong.com

    wrong.com

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/6424937.stm

    i would say "only in America" but this is Germany

Working...
X