Threaded's buy-to-let hits problems

Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

sasguru replied

6 March 2007, 14:06
Nyet. Dosvadanya.
Leave a comment:
andy replied

6 March 2007, 13:38
sasguru is atw
and i claim 5 roubles
Leave a comment:
Spacecadet replied

6 March 2007, 13:26
Originally posted by realityhack

Are you two one and the same? Don't lie to us now...

one of them is SKA, the other is an idiot
Leave a comment:
realityhack replied

6 March 2007, 11:57
Are you two one and the same? Don't lie to us now...
Leave a comment:
AtW replied

6 March 2007, 11:52
Originally posted by sasguru

atw is right.

You can say that again...
Leave a comment:
sasguru replied

6 March 2007, 11:48
Originally posted by Addanc

Doesn't the placing of the apostrophe denote a plural form of ownship, surely there is only ONE threaded?

As that Walter Mitty character, Threaded, has invented a machine which can move between multi universes, there are many Threadeds.
Hence atw is right.

HTH.
Leave a comment:
realityhack replied

6 March 2007, 11:37
Originally posted by Addanc

Doesn't the placing of the apostrophe denote a plural form of ownship, surely there is only ONE threaded?

Indeed it does - except where the proper noun ends in s - then the apostrophe is after it. In this case it's "Threaded's". QED.

Best get to work on that smiley.
Leave a comment:
Addanc replied

6 March 2007, 11:32
Originally posted by AtW

Threadeds'

Doesn't the placing of the apostrophe denote a plural form of ownship, surely there is only ONE threaded?
Leave a comment:
AtW replied

6 March 2007, 11:15
Threadeds'
Leave a comment:
Spacecadet replied

6 March 2007, 11:07
Originally posted by Troll

I'm not sure what their beef was - did the 'Left wing activists' actually own the building or were they just peeved off that their free squat place was been taken away from them ?

it was just a squat that they had been ILLEGALLY occupying since sometime in the 80's.
I remember seeing a programme about it a few years ago (maybe 10 or more), was basically full of crustys denouncing capitalism and everything else that gave them the easy life they enjoy so much.
Leave a comment:
Troll replied

6 March 2007, 10:45
I'm not sure what their beef was - did the 'Left wing activists' actually own the building or were they just peeved off that their free squat place was been taken away from them ?
Leave a comment:
ZZZZ Snoozer started a topic Threaded's buy-to-let hits problems

6 March 2007, 10:20
Threaded's buy-to-let hits problems

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/6418565.stm
Tags: None