• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Luck for them they weren't motorists"

Collapse

  • ZZZZ Snoozer
    replied
    Originally posted by SallyAnne
    Dont you just hate it when you make spelling mistakes in the title
    Damn, was slow in making required correction. This was caused by having to log in again (timeout == 10 seconds or what?)

    Leave a comment:


  • SallyAnne
    replied
    Dont you just hate it when you make spelling mistakes in the title

    Leave a comment:


  • ZZZZ Snoozer
    started a topic Luck for them they weren't motorists

    Luck for them they weren't motorists

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6407315.stm

    Rest assured that those crims convicted when ignoring illegal traffic signs (or whatever) won't be so lucky.
    Last edited by ZZZZ Snoozer; 1 March 2007, 12:47.

Working...
X