• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Silicon Valley Bank (UK)"

Collapse

  • AtW
    replied
    Rates will keep going up - they are almost where they should be, need to be 5-6% level and it’s job done.

    Leave a comment:


  • mogga71
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post

    Depositors (especially wealthy who can move lots of money abroad) into regulated banks should have no risk - owners of bank, managers, those who lend money to bank - yes, lots of risk.
    Todays news from America is massive. First sign of trouble and the Fed folds. This is going to have a massive impact on the future Fed decisions on rate rises. They will halt them soon and come up with any excuse so that they can pivot.

    Basically this has proven that it's impossible to raise rates without breaking the entire financial system....meaning we won't be able to get inflation under control but that plays second fiddle when faced with a potential bank crisis.

    Peter Schiff called it spot on years ago. The Fed is trapped ... there is literally no way out. Hyperinflation here we come.

    Time to start buying risk on assets as if there is no tomorrow.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by Zigenare View Post
    You appear to advocate risk without repercussion.
    Depositors (especially wealthy who can move lots of money abroad) into regulated banks should have no risk - owners of bank, managers, those who lend money to bank - yes, lots of risk.

    Leave a comment:


  • Zigenare
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Best possible outcome is confidence that 100% of deposits are covered, as they should be formally in law.
    You appear to advocate risk without repercussion.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Best possible outcome is confidence that 100% of deposits are covered, as they should be formally in law.

    Leave a comment:


  • jamesbrown
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Oh wow all deposits are safe? Isn’t that immoral? No it fecking ain’t!



    Banking collapse averted… for now
    Don’t be a massive cretin

    Best possible outcome. No need to involve taxpayers to save VCs and other risk management idiots that cannot, er, manage risk.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Oh wow all deposits are safe? Isn’t that immoral? No it fecking ain’t!



    Banking collapse averted… for now

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    To add from The Guardian:

    Bank of England: all depositors’ money with SVBUK is safe The sale to HSBC this morning has been taken to “stabilise SVBUK”, says the Bank of England.

    The UK central bank says the deal will ensure the continuity of banking services, minimise disruption to the UK technology sector and support confidence in the financial system.

    Importantly, the Bank of England and HM Treasury can confirm that all depositors’ money with SVBUK is safe and secure as a result of this transaction.

    That will be a massive relief for tech companies, who feared an ‘existential threat’ to their businesses if they had lost their funds at SVB UK.

    The BoE add that the deal with HSBC means SVB UK will not now be put into insolvency. It says:

    SVBUK’s business will continue to be operated normally by SVBUK. All services will continue to operate as normal and customers should not notice any changes.

    Customers can continue to contact SVBUK through the usual channels and borrowers should make any loan repayments to SVBUK as normal. SVBUK staff remain employed by SVBUK, and SVBUK continues to be a PRA/FCA authorised bank.

    Today’s announcement supersedes the Bank’s 10 March statement that, absent any meaningful further information, it intended to apply to the Court to place SVBUK into a Bank Insolvency Procedure. Given the emergence of a credible purchaser for SVBUK the Bank has determined that using its resolution powers for stabilising failing banks is appropriate.

    No other UK banks are directly materially affected by these actions, or by the resolution of SVBUK’s US parent bank. The wider UK banking system remains safe, sound, and well capitalised.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    HSBC to the rescue

    https://www.theguardian.com/business...-business-live

    Newsflash: HSBC UK Bank plc is acquiring Silicon Valley Bank UK Limited (SVB UK) for £1, after a weekend of frantic negotiations by UK officials.
    In a statment to the City, HSBC says the transaction “completes immediately”. The acquisition will be funded from existing resources.

    The bank adds:

    As at 10 March 2023, SVB UK had loans of around £5.5bn and deposits of around £6.7bn. For the financial year ending 31 December 2022, SVB UK recorded a profit before tax of £88m. SVB UK’s tangible equity is expected to be around £1.4bn. Final calculation of the gain arising from the acquisition will be provided in due course.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by jamesbrown View Post
    That sounds about right
    It should be right - certain services like having money in a bank should not be a worry to the owner and if private banks can't fking do it then money should and will be deposited in BoE account, which is ... fully guaranteed?

    Maybe banks with deposits should be obligated to keep said money there and solve this non-existent problem of guaranteeing 100% of customer money?

    Leave a comment:


  • jamesbrown
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    it's a no brainer to accept.
    That sounds about right

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by jamesbrown View Post
    I don't suppose you had an account with SVB UK...
    Took you a long time to ask...

    Nope.

    Using one of them "too-big-to-fail" banks...

    I always thought it was idiotic to use something like SVB, however if your VCs term sheet says you get XX mln for YY shares, and last condition is to keep money in SVB then it's a no brainer to accept.

    Leave a comment:


  • jamesbrown
    replied
    I don't suppose you had an account with SVB UK...

    Leave a comment:


  • jamesbrown
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post


    I wonder if there's a way to automate that smiley with your posts

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by jamesbrown View Post
    As long as it costs the taxpayer nothing, there is nothing to complain about.


    Leave a comment:

Working...
X