• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "DOOM: Lateral Flow Tests Screw Up"

Collapse

  • Hobosapien
    replied
    I expect the army are achieving a quicker throughput, so they can do a best of three to up the accuracy rate while still being quicker than the 'professionals'.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Nah, just needs experience - 57% is not so bad if used en mass - also chances are this test gets the most important people those who got virus and highly infectious, where as PCR can get positive past point of infectionness

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    started a topic DOOM: Lateral Flow Tests Screw Up

    DOOM: Lateral Flow Tests Screw Up

    Done by health professionals 73% accuracy by the army 57% accuracy.

    So another government screw up.

Working...
X