• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "England rugby star Courtney Lawes calls on Government to incentivise marriage"

Collapse

  • Gibbon
    replied
    Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
    I've been cohabiting for the same amount of years as that person has been alive, never hurt me. In fact I find it much better than the old fashioned concept of having to go through the whole marriage concept
    No but in English Law you are not NoK, can bite very hard when one of you dies for the survivor. Marriage isn't a concept its a very public declaration of love and commitment, which is exactly why the gay community have been pressing for it in it's fullest sense.

    Leave a comment:


  • elsergiovolador
    replied
    Some people need the nanny state to approve their relationship. They need to feel they are being supervised, otherwise their life falls apart (mostly in their imagination).

    Leave a comment:


  • SussexSeagull
    replied
    Isn't this all a bit chicken and egg? Presumably one of the reasons married couples stay together is they felt they were committed enough to each other to get married. If you start offering a financial incentive people might start entering marriages on a less firm footing?

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
    Children of married parents have by far the best life outcomes. This should be seen as investment.

    And I'm sure when the "My Dads are married" numbers build they will show less than ideal outcomes.
    The figures are skewed as if you are wealthier you are more likely to wait to have children until you are older and therefore more likely to bother getting married. Wealthier parents children tend to have better life outcomes anyway.

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    Children of married parents have by far the best life outcomes. This should be seen as investment.

    And I'm sure when the "My Dads are married" numbers build they will show less than ideal outcomes.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Doesn't cohabitation help the taxman especially at the lower end?

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    I've been cohabiting for the same amount of years as that person has been alive, never hurt me. In fact I find it much better than the old fashioned concept of having to go through the whole marriage concept

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    This bunch of idiots have made enough screw ups already.

    Leave a comment:


  • England rugby star Courtney Lawes calls on Government to incentivise marriage

    “ England rugby star Courtney Lawes has called on the Government to incentivise marriage, as a new report reveals cohabiting couples are four times more likely to separate.

    Writing in the Telegraph, the 31-year-old lock insists: "A stable family means one where the parents are married.””

    Exclusive: England rugby star Courtney Lawes calls on Government to incentivise marriage

    Law legalising pre-nups would do nicely

Working...
X