• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: The Report

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "The Report"

Collapse

  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
    Tories need face to face meetings! Interestingly not to countries with lower COVID-19 infection and death rates
    Countries with lower Covid-19 rates don’t allow higher Russian infections to feck them up.

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Russia plans to resume some international flights from 1 August, deputy prime minister Tatiana Golikova said on Friday, but the list of destinations will initially be limited to Tanzania, Turkey and the United Kingdom.
    Tories need face to face meetings! Interestingly not to countries with lower COVID-19 infection and death rates

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    It was never even posted

    HTH
    Fancy Squirrel is behind it.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by Zigenare View Post
    Was this an "Official" post?
    It was never even posted

    HTH

    Leave a comment:


  • Zigenare
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    “ However, the report concludes that there is no direct evidence of Russian influence in the 2016 Brexit referendum.”

    Russia report: Kremlin 'tried to meddle in Scottish independence vote' - but did not target Brexit



    And why there would be direct evidence when people who can get it know they will be whacked later in Britain even if that involves usage of banned chemical weapons?
    Was this an "Official" post?

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post

    “However, the report concludes that there is no direct evidence of Russian influence in the 2016 Brexit referendum.” ..
    It was pitiful watching obviously Remainer commentators interviewing the MPs on the committee, desperately trying to uncover an EU referendum angle, in a last ditch effort to derail Brexit.

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • Jog On
    replied
    Originally posted by Mordac View Post
    Why are you bothered about a channel nobody watches?
    (Perhaps I'm showing my age, but to me RT will always mean the Radio Times .)
    He has a slight obsession with it - and ZH (Zerohedge). RT's take:

    ‘Nothing sensational. Fake-shaped Russophobia’: Moscow brushes aside UK report on Russian interference — RT Russia News

    British state media also operates in Russia and covers the Russian political scene, strongly favoring opposition movements.

    Among other things, the report claimed that Russia had secretly had a hand in the 2014 Scottish independence referendum, but said public allegations that it had influenced the 2016 Brexit referendum could not be confirmed by British intelligence. Some have pointed out that this suits the present British government which supports Brexit, but opposes Scottish independence.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mordac
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Russia report: UK 'badly underestimated' threat, says committee - BBC News

    FFS - shut down RT, even if Russia bans BBC - there is far more damage RT does here than any good BBC can do in totally controlled Russia.

    Start dealing with money laundering - of dirty money billions go via London and feck all is done about it.

    And cancel visas for kids of Russian officials FFS
    Why are you bothered about a channel nobody watches?
    (Perhaps I'm showing my age, but to me RT will always mean the Radio Times .)

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Russia report: UK 'badly underestimated' threat, says committee - BBC News

    FFS - shut down RT, even if Russia bans BBC - there is far more damage RT does here than any good BBC can do in totally controlled Russia.

    Start dealing with money laundering - of dirty money billions go via London and feck all is done about it.

    And cancel visas for kids of Russian officials FFS

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    It’s all BS because Russian Ambassador gave strong denial - instead of wasting taxpayers money on investigations they should have just asked him.

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Worse - it was “actively avoided” as quoted by the BBC - Russian moles inside HM Govt prevented the real official investigation
    There have been widespread public allegations that Russia sought to influence the 2016 referendum on the UK’s membership of the EU. The impact of any such attempts would be difficult - if not impossible - to assess, and we have not sought to do so.
    However, it is important to establish whether a hostile state took deliberate action with the aim of influencing a UK democratic process, irrespective of whether it was successful or not.
    And:

    In response to our request for written evidence at the outset of the inquiry, MI5 initially provided just six lines of text.The brevity was also, to us, again, indicative of the extreme caution amongst the intelligence and security agencies at the thought that they might have any role in relation to the UK’s democratic processes, and particularly one as contentious as the EU referendum.


    We repeat that this attitude is illogical; this is about the protection of the process and mechanism from hostile state interference, which should fall to our intelligence and security agencies.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Here is a very simple thing - if they have not found Russian (and Chinese) interference then they simply did not look hard enough.

    ” Malone : Liquor raid. ... Ness, everybody knows where the booze is. The problem isn't finding it, the problem is who wants to cross Capone.

    Not even Her Majesty’s Govt wants to cross Putin - SAD!

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
    That's because it wasn't investigated you utter numpty
    Worse - it was “actively avoided” as quoted by the BBC - Russian moles inside HM Govt prevented the real official investigation

    Leave a comment:


  • TheDogsNads
    replied
    They couldnt find a smokin' gun never mind produce one but, the agenda goes on. Lead in part by an SNP MP. Hey ho.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X