• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Keir Starmer: the next Labour Govt will cut taxes"

Collapse

  • JamesBrown11
    replied


    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    Per divorce?
    Lifetime, so yes - per divorce

    Leave a comment:


  • LondonManc
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    Per divorce?
    Wouldn't that put your life into negative equity?

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    At least £10 mln lifetime allowance...
    Per divorce?

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    Divorces should be tax deductible.
    At least £10 mln lifetime allowance...

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    £70k isn’t rich once you factor in a single divorce.
    Divorces should be tax deductible.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    £70k isn’t rich once you factor in a single divorce.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Sky package alone costs £120 now and that’s not even all add ons

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Originally posted by elsergiovolador View Post
    LibLabCon, driven by the desires of HMRC, wants everyone to be a PAYE serf and work for big corps owned by friends of the party ideally for peanuts.
    .
    FTFY

    Leave a comment:


  • elsergiovolador
    replied
    Originally posted by LondonManc View Post
    60k ain't rich.
    Communists hate people making more than average with passion (except of course the party members) and their mission is to make the Pleb equally poor. That's why there is "progressive" taxation - the more you care and more ambitions you have then the more you get hit.
    They sell it to people who care less as the "fair share" and use various psychological mechanisms to build hatred towards those who earn more.
    Labour wants everyone to be a PAYE serf and work for big corps owned by friends of the party ideally for peanuts.
    Then you have an army of so called useful idiots who think if they keep spreading this ideology, then the party will somehow notice and give them a cushy "job" somewhere.

    Leave a comment:


  • LondonManc
    replied
    The problem isn't salary, it's corporate greed and the reluctance to tax things properly. It's the 0.5% hoovering the wealth - the top 10% of the top 5% that's the problem. I don't see people on 70k and think they're particularly rich. When you consider that they could easily have a 300k mortgage on a 400k property, you look at their household as a limited company and do a simply P&L account for them.

    Take home pay per month from 70k with 5% pension contribs is £3,929
    Mortgage, say, £1,300
    Two cars on PCP, £700
    Two phones on contract, £80
    Sky package and other Netflix, Spotify, etc £100
    Other bills - energy, water, CT, etc - £400

    Soon mounts up and there's nothing there for food, clothes, without exceptional stuff like school fees, gym membership, etc.

    Rich is relative. I'm sure a single-income household on 70k is fecking stressed at the moment and would have gone under if they were furloughed.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    £69K per year.
    Dirty future tax avoider!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    You'll be safe in any case.
    £69K per year.

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    Well £70K puts you in the top 5%

    Now ask Mr and Mrs Pleb labour voter "if we increase taxes heavily, but only for the top 5% earners, 95% will pay no more than they do now"

    What do you think they will say?

    GBP70,000 puts workers in the top 5 per cent of UK earners – why are we so reluctant to acknowledge this? | The Independent
    You'll be safe in any case.

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Well £70K puts you in the top 5%

    Now ask Mr and Mrs Pleb labour voter "if we increase taxes heavily, but only for the top 5% earners, 95% will pay no more than they do now"

    What do you think they will say?

    GBP70,000 puts workers in the top 5 per cent of UK earners – why are we so reluctant to acknowledge this? | The Independent

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X