• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Johnson demands Britain 'Build, build, build' to beat COVID-19 slump"

Collapse

  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Force them to do community service - unpaid moderatorship at CUK...
    And praying for BR14.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Force them to do community service - unpaid moderatorship at CUK...

    Leave a comment:


  • BR14
    replied
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    Seize all their assets and then make them make a case for having some of them returned.
    not much return from a brum kebab shop and a mud hut in a peat bog though.

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Brilliant idea

    Seize all their assets and then make them make a case for having some of them returned.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    They could start by squeezing the aggressive tax avoider scum harder.
    Brilliant idea

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    But new taxes to “fund it” will be much higher
    They could start by squeezing the aggressive tax avoider scum harder.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
    5 billion is also how much the government spent on corona last week
    That’s the problem for the lenders - those mugs should have demanded secured loan

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    5 billion is 75 quid per head of population. Not really very impressive as a stimulus.
    But new taxes to “fund it” will be much higher

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    5 billion is also how much the government spent on corona last week

    Sent from my 5g carrier pigeon

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    5 billion is 75 quid per head of population. Not really very impressive as a stimulus.

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by Martin@AS Financial View Post
    What a sad commentary on our times, that the UK should have to resort to the "poor man's" economic stimulus of building!

    That's the typical starting technique of former so called Third World countries, initially lacking the skills and education to make high-tech things, but they soon catch up and now, it seems, are passing the UK heading in the opposite direction!

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    But announcing to do it MUCH faster is quite significant considering their manifesto set things out for far longer timescale than a government term, this means they actually have to do it not promise it.
    You are cute.

    Leave a comment:


  • scooterscot
    replied
    The Tory supporters love those three-word soundbites. "I got every word in that sentence"

    Build build build - "I've been building at home!" He gets my vote.

    Leave a comment:


  • jamesbrown
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    But announcing to do it MUCH faster is quite significant considering their manifesto set things out for far longer timescale than a government term, this means they actually have to do it not promise it.
    What was the accelerated timescale? The house building stuff does some sleight of hand w/ 5 years funding and 8 years delivery, but I think that is the same timetable and money they announced before. What else? I admit that I wasn't listening closely...

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    It was quite an interesting speech. A lot of big promises. A LOT of spending.
    No promises. He called them pledges as in; when there is a natural disaster when governments pledge money and then they forget about it.

    After the speech the pound slumped to a new low.
    Last edited by Paddy; 30 June 2020, 15:14.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X