• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "'There is no war on terror'"

Collapse

  • pisces
    replied
    You've watched too many sci-fi movies.

    Leave a comment:


  • hattra
    replied
    Originally posted by pisces
    Because they aren't darkies.
    Yes they are - dark green

    Leave a comment:


  • pisces
    replied
    Originally posted by wendigo100
    Why isn't there a war on Giant Alien Lizards taking over the world?
    Because they aren't darkies.

    Leave a comment:


  • AlfredJPruffock
    replied
    “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it.

    The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”


    Goebels 1943


    LONDON (Reuters) - Prime Minister Tony Blair said on Wednesday it would be "deeply irresponsible" to set an arbitrary deadline for pulling British forces out of Iraq.

    Britain has some 7,100 troops in southern Iraq. Blair, undermined politically by his support for the U.S.-led war in Iraq, is under increasing pressure to name the date soldiers can start to come home before he steps down later this year.

    But responding to a proposal by the Liberal Democrat party to bring troops home by October, Blair said this would send a disastrous message to the insurgents whom British forces are battling in Basra in southern Iraq.

    "For us to set an arbitrary timetable -- not attached to the conditions in Iraq, simply saying that we will pull British troops out in October come what may -- would send the most disastrous signal to the people that we are fighting in Iraq," Blair told lawmakers.

    "It is a policy that, whatever its superficial attractions may be, is actually deeply irresponsible ... " he said.

    Blair's decision not to take part in a later parliamentary debate on Iraq and Middle East policy drew sharp criticism from his political opponents.

    Blair Jan 24 2007 Airstrip One
    Last edited by AlfredJPruffock; 24 January 2007, 17:22.

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Originally posted by Bagpuss
    That's how long he's been working the local fun-fair House of mirrors attraction.
    Well over an hour to come up with that feeble rebuff baggy. As sharp as a donut!

    Leave a comment:


  • Bagpuss
    replied
    Originally posted by shaunbhoy
    For at least the last decade!!
    That's how long he's been working the local fun-fair House of mirrors attraction.

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Originally posted by The Lone Gunman
    glad to see you still have aspirations, one day you may reach the heady heights of moron .
    Rest assured, if I ever become a moron I will contact you for mentoring TLG.

    Leave a comment:


  • The Lone Gunman
    replied
    Originally posted by shaunbhoy
    For at least the last decade!!
    glad to see you still have aspirations, one day you may reach the heady heights of moron .

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Originally posted by realityhack
    Ever get the feeling you're surrounded by a nation full of ******* morons?
    For at least the last decade!!

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Originally posted by Bagpuss
    Those evil bomb making Muskies will rejoice at your tree Hugging lilly-liveredness

    Mailman/Shaunbhoy x
    Still desperately seeking some form of acceptance on here, eh Baggy?

    Leave a comment:


  • wendigo100
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost
    Xogg for PM!
    Why isn't there a war on Giant Alien Lizards taking over the world?

    Leave a comment:


  • Spartacus
    replied
    Originally posted by Churchill
    ZG is Chico and I claim my 5 groats.
    More likely ZG ate Chico and absorbed some of his so-called self-styled "personality".

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost
    Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaargh!

    The Emperor has no clothes.... particularly not the prohibitionist Septics and their totally ineffective so called self styled "war on drugs".
    ZG is Chico and I claim my 5 groats.

    Leave a comment:


  • Spartacus
    replied
    Originally posted by xoggoth
    many now believe it is OK for suspects to be questioned by police with no representation and that it is not a big deal if we get wrong convictions.
    Yeah, it's all okay until it's you that's wrongly convicted.

    Leave a comment:


  • hattra
    replied
    Curious, isn't it, that our own government has adopted the tactics of the Bader-Meinhof group. Generate enough terror, and the people will beg the state to take away their liberties (with guidance on how to acheive this being provided by the same State, of course).

    Of course the second part of the Bader-Meinhof strategy, which they never got to implement, all being in gaol or dead, was that the people would eventually realise that they were now being oppressed, and would rise up and destroy the state (with guidance on how to acheive this being provided by the Bader-Meinhof group, of course).

    Then the glorious anarchist errrr, non-state would arise and liberate the people from the oppression of being organised, or having to wash every day, or something

    Quite like the second bit - though the anarchy stuff never seems to work in a group any bigger than two people.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X