• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: End of the UK

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "End of the UK"

Collapse

  • AlfredJPruffock
    replied
    Originally posted by expat
    I'll just add for those who may be unfamiliar with this, that it is Robert Burns's condemnation of those who sold out Scotland's independence for the lure of English Gold: notably, the "parcel of rogues" that Burns condemned were the Scots who sold out, not the English.

    I take the point as applied to the present day.
    The Love of Money is the root of All Evil

    Leave a comment:


  • expat
    replied
    Originally posted by AlfredJPruffock
    It's time Expat - It's Time

    ...
    We're bought and sold for English gold,
    Such a parcel of rogues in a nation!
    I'll just add for those who may be unfamiliar with this, that it is Robert Burns's condemnation of those who sold out Scotland's independence for the lure of English Gold: notably, the "parcel of rogues" that Burns condemned were the Scots who sold out, not the English.

    I take the point as applied to the present day.

    Leave a comment:


  • AlfredJPruffock
    replied
    Originally posted by expat
    It's now 40 years since Schumacher pointed out that the Germans would be saying the same things about Denmark if they had succeeded in annexing it. And pointing out how Denmark couldn't survive economically on its own.

    Instead, if you now ask a Dane whether they wouldn't prefer to be German, I think you'd get a different view.

    As Schumacher said, larger countries rarely subsidise their smaller neighbours: usually they exploit them under the guise of an accounting system that makes it look like subsidy.

    This is exactly the case with England and Scotland. You point to the Barnett Formula advantages to Scotland but miss the fact that tax flows from Scotland to the UK more than cover that. You point to greater GDP and tax income from SE England than from Scotland, conveniently ignoring the fact that this naive calculation (for example) shows all oil profit and tax as being generated in London (because that's where the oil companies' accountants and tax offices are), somewhat unrealistic by any standards.
    It's time Expat - It's Time

    Robert Burns on the Union of the Crowns


    Fareweel to a' our Scotish fame,
    Fareweel our ancient glory;
    Fareweel even to the Scotish name,
    Sae fam'd in martial story!
    Now Sark rins o'er the Solway sands,
    And Tweed rins to the ocean,
    To mark whare England's province stands,
    Such a parcel of rogues in a nation!

    What force or guile could not subdue,
    Thro' many warlike ages,
    Is wrought now by a coward few,
    For hireling traitors' wages.
    The English steel we could disdain,
    Secure in valor's station;
    But English gold has been our bane,
    Such a parcel of rogues in a nation!

    O would, or I had seen the day
    That treason thus could sell us,
    My auld grey head had lien in clay,
    Wi Bruce and loyal Wallace!
    But pith and power, till my last hour,
    I'll mak this declaration;
    We're bought and sold for English gold,
    Such a parcel of rogues in a nation!
    Last edited by AlfredJPruffock; 15 January 2007, 15:33.

    Leave a comment:


  • expat
    replied
    Originally posted by freakydancer
    Exactly. We've been funding these 3rd world neighbours of ours way too long.
    Once the break up is complete, we should cut them off and let them float away.
    It's now 40 years since Schumacher pointed out that the Germans would be saying the same things about Denmark if they had succeeded in annexing it. And pointing out how Denmark couldn't survive economically on its own.

    Instead, if you now ask a Dane whether they wouldn't prefer to be German, I think you'd get a different view.

    As Schumacher said, larger countries rarely subsidise their smaller neighbours: usually they exploit them under the guise of an accounting system that makes it look like subsidy.

    This is exactly the case with England and Scotland. You point to the Barnett Formula advantages to Scotland but miss the fact that tax flows from Scotland to the UK more than cover that. You point to greater GDP and tax income from SE England than from Scotland, conveniently ignoring the fact that this naive calculation (for example) shows all oil profit and tax as being generated in London (because that's where the oil companies' accountants and tax offices are), somewhat unrealistic by any standards.

    Leave a comment:


  • AlfredJPruffock
    replied
    Roads to Freedom 1984 and beyond



    SUPER-COMPUTER

    Tony Blair is expected to announce today that sensitive personal data could be swapped by Whitehall departments. Ministers believe restrictions on data-sharing between civil servants are too strict. A 'super-database' or 'super-computer' holding everyone's records would be similar to a planned children's database.

    DNA DATABASE

    The Prime Minister has suggested that the DNA of every British adult should be stored by the state. The national database already holds 3.7 million samples, 6 per cent of the population, far higher than any other country. More than one million have been taken from people never convicted of an offence.

    CCTV

    The British are among the world's most observed people. Some 4.2 million closed-circuit television cameras record our every move - one for every 14 people and more per head than any other country in Europe or North America. The average Londoner can be caught on camera 300 times a day.

    MEDICAL RECORDS

    Millions of medical records are to be transferred to a central NHS database, allowing staff anywhere to access patients' information. People who object will not be able to opt out. The most personal information will be available to hospital managers, IT departments, high street pharmacists and civil servants.

    IDENTITY CARDS

    The first identity cards will be issued next year to foreign nationals and from 2009 to UK citizens. Anyone who renews a passport will be forced to register and the Government aims to make ID cards compulsory within six years. Fifty-two pieces of information, including fingerprints and iris scans, will be held.

    SPY IN THE SKY

    Motorists are already monitored through the soaring number of road cameras. In an effort to cut congestion, the Department of Transport is examining plans to use satellite technology to keep tabs on every vehicle's exact movements. Motorists, forced to have a black box fitted in their cars, would be billedfor every journey they make.

    Growth of surveillance

    1984: DNA fingerprinting method discoverd by accident by Sir Alec Jeffreys

    1985: Outdoor CCTV camera erected in Bournemouth

    1994: Government paves the way for huge expansion of CCTV

    1995: The world's first National DNA Database established in England and Wales.

    1999: Tony Blair gives a sample of his DNA

    2001: Sir Alec Jeffreys calls for profiles of entire UK population to be held

    2004: Number of DNA profiles hits the two million mark

    2004: Information Commissonaire Richard Thomas warns that Britain is 'sleepwalking into a surveillance society'

    2005: MPs vote to introduce identity cards

    2006: National Black Police Assocation call for inquiry into why black people are over represented on DNA database

    2006: Identity Cards Act becomes law

    2007: Data-sharing by Whitehall departments likely to be introduced

    2008: Foreign nationals will have to start supplying fingerprints, eye or facial scans added to a National Identity register

    2008: Children's database, covering all under-16s in England and Wales, will be launched

    2009: The first biometric identity cards will be issued to British citizens when they renew their passport

    2010: NHS Database will store the records of 50 million patients providing details over the internet

    2012?: ID cards compulsory

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    We have cut the links between child
    and parent, and between man and man, and between man and woman.
    No one dares trust a wife or a child or a friend any longer.
    But in the future there will be no wives and no friends.
    Children will be taken from their mothers at birth, as one
    takes eggs from a hen. The sex instinct will be eradicated.
    Procreation will be an annual formality like the renewal of a
    ration card. We shall abolish the orgasm. Our neurologists are
    at work upon it now. There will be no loyalty, except loyalty
    towards the Party. There will be no love, except the love of
    Big Brother. There will be no laughter, except the laugh of
    triumph over a defeated enemy. There will be no art, no
    literature, no science. When we are omnipotent we shall have no
    more need of science. There will be no distinction between
    beauty and ugliness. There will be no curiosity, no enjoyment
    of the process of life.
    2007 - New Labour

    Leave a comment:


  • AlfredJPruffock
    replied
    Originally posted by wendigo100
    Torran has described it about right.

    It's another 1984 theme. I really don't know why I said it now - it just popped out.
    The room darkened as the talk turned to Eric Blairs 1984 ...

    You too Wendigo ?

    I thought I had purged myself earlier this year of Eric Blair when I had about a month of threads last Jan including the Central Scrutiniser - for those who may recall but I cant help it - is there no escape from this darkness ?

    You'll be shooting up on anything
    Tomorrows never there
    Beware the savage jaw
    of 1984 ...

    Leave a comment:


  • Swamp Thing
    replied
    If the CIA are reading this board (and why wouldn’t they?), please please please rendition Gordon Brown’s @rse to Camp X-Ray.

    Leave a comment:


  • Troll
    replied
    Originally posted by wendigo100
    Torran has described it about right.

    It's another 1984 theme. I really don't know why I said it now - it just popped out.
    I thought you were replying to my Big Ben post.... your mind must have been elsewhere

    Leave a comment:


  • Buffoon
    replied
    Originally posted by Troll
    eh???
    We have cut the links between child
    and parent, and between man and man, and between man and woman.
    No one dares trust a wife or a child or a friend any longer.
    But in the future there will be no wives and no friends.
    Children will be taken from their mothers at birth, as one
    takes eggs from a hen. The sex instinct will be eradicated.
    Procreation will be an annual formality like the renewal of a
    ration card. We shall abolish the orgasm. Our neurologists are
    at work upon it now. There will be no loyalty, except loyalty
    towards the Party. There will be no love, except the love of
    Big Brother. There will be no laughter, except the laugh of
    triumph over a defeated enemy. There will be no art, no
    literature, no science. When we are omnipotent we shall have no
    more need of science. There will be no distinction between
    beauty and ugliness. There will be no curiosity, no enjoyment
    of the process of life.
    1984 - George Orwell.

    Leave a comment:


  • Torran
    replied
    Originally posted by Troll
    Nope... but a remarkable amount of English support for letting Scotland go
    hardly a fecking surprise. Couldn't care less to be honest, we're all fooked anyway.

    Leave a comment:


  • Troll
    replied
    Originally posted by wendigo100
    Spacecadet did. He's got family in Carlisle.
    He is correct - but being too literal when I said rebuild HW- and I can't think of the word for a conceptual idea rather than a geophysical location... & it's not bolloxs btw

    Leave a comment:


  • wendigo100
    replied
    Originally posted by Troll
    eh???
    Torran has described it about right.

    It's another 1984 theme. I really don't know why I said it now - it just popped out.

    Leave a comment:


  • Torran
    replied
    Originally posted by wendigo100
    Spacecadet did. He's got family in Carlisle.
    nibbles don't count

    Leave a comment:


  • Troll
    replied
    Originally posted by Torran



    no one biting?
    Nope... but a remarkable amount of English support for letting Scotland go

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X