- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: 420mph in a 30mph zone
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "420mph in a 30mph zone"
Collapse
-
As I said, it's an absolute offence. Essentailly if you plead not guilty then the NIP is simply a disputed set of facts. If the police have anything to back it up (e.g. a camera reading of 37) then unless you can get that ruled inadmissible or disprove it you are not going to get acquitted.But surely a typo such as getting your speed wildly wrong is different to maybe a typo in your address?
I might go to court if a NIP says I was doing 97 in a 30 but accept 37 in a 30? So was I doing 97 or did they type the speed in wrong?
If they can't be relied on in serving a prosecution notice, how can you rely on anything?
Case dismissed. Feck orf!
http://www.pepipoo.com/Basics.htm
Leave a comment:
-
But surely a typo such as getting your speed wildly wrong is different to maybe a typo in your address?
I might go to court if a NIP says I was doing 97 in a 30 but accept 37 in a 30? So was I doing 97 or did they type the speed in wrong?
If they can't be relied on in serving a prosecution notice, how can you rely on anything?
Case dismissed. Feck orf!
Leave a comment:
-
You thought wrong. There is provision for typos's to be corrected.Originally posted by DimPrawnI thought that if there was an error in the NIP, it has to be dropped?
Also in the event of a not guiltly plea it becomes largely irrelevant. Speeding is an absolute offence. It only remains for the police to establish evidence that he was speeding to the magistrates rather than he was doing 420mph.
There are some circumstances where an erroneous NIP may prove fatal to the prosecution, e.g. the reg no is shown wrongly - just fill in the S172 notice saying it's not your vehicle and tell them to far koff when they reissue it.
Leave a comment:
-
Why did he bring it to thier attention?
I'd have shut up and waited for it to go to court and in court said Ok prove i was doing 420. Oh you can't? Case dismissed please
Leave a comment:
-
For him lets hope his lawyer knows that!Originally posted by MailmanYou thought right.
Mailman
Leave a comment:
-
I thought that if there was an error in the NIP, it has to be dropped?
Leave a comment:
-
420mph in a 30mph zone
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/south_east/6231085.stm
"Thank you for highlighting the error in the original notice. Please rest assured that a new notice, with the correct speed, has been issued in your name. Payment can be made online or with any major credit card"
MailmanTags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Today 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Yesterday 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Jan 28 08:11
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Jan 27 08:41
- Contractors, a £25million crackdown on rogue company directors is coming Jan 26 05:02
- How to run a contractor limited company — efficiently. Part one: software Jan 22 23:31

Leave a comment: