Originally posted by AtW
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Huawei vs US
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Huawei vs US"
Collapse
-
Hostile foreign undemocratic regimes should have never been allowed to have any leverage - especially in high tech.
Leave a comment:
-
Round two of the secret cyberwar.
Round one was Super Micro China super spy chip super scandal: US Homeland Security, UK spies back Amazon, Apple denials • The Register
Leave a comment:
-
Is there anything you are not a contra-indicator for? Chinese technical theft is estimated at $80Bn per year and there will be more companies targeted.
Some people are letting their dislike of the US president cloud their judgement.
Leave a comment:
-
I wonder how badly it will hurt Apple:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...ump-huawei-ban
Apple could lose nearly a third of its profit if China retaliated by banning its products, Goldman Sachs analysts estimated this week. Dan Ives, an analyst at Wedbush Securities, said 3% to 5% of iPhone sales in China may disappear over the next 12 to 18 months because of the U.S. ban on Huawei. Apple shares were down less than 1% at 9:36 a.m. in New York.
Apple would face much more dire consequences if production restrictions were implemented in China, Goldman analysts led by Rod Hall wrote in a research note.
Leave a comment:
-
Needs more paranoid cretinism and thrice removed conspiracy theory.
Leave a comment:
-
Huawei vs US
You lot are awfully quiet on this. Trump's latest tantrum, nothing more than an effort to control the free market which will surely have more impact on companies in the UK (ARM), the US for sure (Google, hardware manufactures), as well as Huawei themselves.
Huawei are being a class act all the way. The US is attacking a private company to help level the playing field in support of their own brands, which are 2-3 years behind Huawei.
German media "Der Spiegel": Huawei equipment "back door" was not found, the United States Cisco has found 10 since 2013
Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- What contractors can take from the Industria Umbrella Ltd case Yesterday 23:05
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Yesterday 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 24 05:05
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 23 21:05
- IR35: Mutuality Of Obligations — updated for 2025/26 Sep 23 05:22
- Only proactive IT contractors can survive recruitment firm closures Sep 22 07:32
Leave a comment: