• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "MP’s demand smart motorway rollout to be stopped"

Collapse

  • chopper
    replied
    On the M60, they caused years of traffic jams to build a smart motorway where the end result was for the vast majority of the smart motorway section, there was no new road capacity (including no actual hard shoulder running). Quite a lot of money spent to basically put up new signs and resurface the road.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mordac
    replied
    Originally posted by Zigenare View Post
    Armadillo?
    I was thinking more along the lines of "neither of them work properly" or "neither were designed to benefit the user/consumer".

    Leave a comment:


  • Zigenare
    replied
    Originally posted by Mordac View Post
    Smart Motorways. Smart Meters. Anyone else spot the glaring similarity here?
    Armadillo?

    Leave a comment:


  • Mordac
    replied
    Smart Motorways. Smart Meters. Anyone else spot the glaring similarity here?

    Leave a comment:


  • psychocandy
    replied
    Used to work on a project where "some" of the work was roadside (comms equipment etc). I never did (being more office server focused) but everyone had to do the training.

    Sitting in your car on the hard shoulder whether smart motorway or not is the dullest thing you can do. Get out and get behind the barriers whether its pissing down or not.

    In fact, unless you're in a proper area, it was a disciplinary offence if staff got caught spending more than 15 MINUTES stopped on the hard shoulder for any reason whatsoever.

    Leave a comment:


  • Yorkie62
    replied
    Originally posted by GreenMirror View Post
    Undertaking is legal unless it is deemed careless.

    About 10% of drivers are totally clueless and should not be on the roads. More regular testing is needed.
    [QUOTE=original PM;2608570]The best general rule about undertaking is flash your lights at the pr*ck in front of you whilst giving the a hand signal of your choice. Then wind your drivers window down, boot it and undertake whilst waving the number of fingers of your choice at the driver of the other vehicle indicating just how many minutes they have been holding you up for. When in front of said vehicle , now test the reaction time of said driver to assess his alertness and suitability to be on the road, thus making them aware that they may need to take a break. Now boot it once more to close the gap to the car in front to a minimum and repeat.
    QUOTE]

    FTFY

    Leave a comment:


  • BlueSharp
    replied
    The M42 was one of the first motorways to go smart. Took 15 minutes off an hour commute, it's now considered a nightmare and acceptable reason for being late when the 4th lane is not open.

    Yes there are idiots on the road but they are still idiots regardless of the motorway being smart. I'm sure I saw a stat that said that the smart motorways are actually safer.

    A reference to the M42 study:

    Smart motorways | Improvements and major road projects

    Leave a comment:


  • original PM
    replied
    The best general rule about undertaking is do not do it unless you are in 'slow' moving traffic and it is not really feasible to go round them.

    Classic example of this is coming out of Manchester down the 62 - 50 miles an hour to pretty much the junction with the M6 all three lanes of traffic just move at the speed they move at.

    Obviously you always get some prick desperate to get 200 yards further down the road by weaving in and out of traffic but there you go.

    Leave a comment:


  • Yorkie62
    replied
    Originally posted by GreenMirror View Post
    Undertaking is legal unless it is deemed careless.

    About 10% of drivers are totally clueless and should not be on the roads. More regular testing is needed.
    Absolutely. Maybe I should have put this bit in bold in my original post

    However, the onus and responsibility for completing the undertaking manoeuvre safely lies with the person performing the undertaking maneuverer.

    Leave a comment:


  • GreenMirror
    replied
    Originally posted by Yorkie62 View Post
    Undertaking is fine and legal - end of.
    The status or speed of the traffic being undertaken is irrelevant. However, the onus and responsibility for completing the undertaking manoeuvre safely lies with the person performing the undertaking maneuverer.
    Smart motorways do generally work in high traffic density situations as they bring all the traffic down to the speed of the lowest common denominator, i.e. articulated lorries, and therefore there should be no reason for anyone to change lanes, except when entering or leaving the motorway. Where the problems do occur is down to lack of forward planning by drivers who wait until the last possible moment to get into the correct lane to leave the motorway, causing either themselves to brake (having a knock-on effect) or the traffic lanes they are trying to enter to brake (having a knock-on effect). Simple planning, forward thinking, and an acknowledgement of the rule Mirror, Signal, maneuverer IF SAFE TO DO SO, would go a long way on UKJ motorways.
    Undertaking is legal unless it is deemed careless.

    About 10% of drivers are totally clueless and should not be on the roads. More regular testing is needed.

    Leave a comment:


  • GreenMirror
    replied
    I like that everyone hogs the outside 2 lanes. Leaves the others clear for me.

    What I object to is doing so many junctions at once. M6 a joke at the moment.

    Leave a comment:


  • Yorkie62
    replied
    Originally posted by BlueSharp View Post
    But as everyone is crawling along below 60 there is no reason not to drive in the first 2 as they are nice and clear and undertaking is fine in queuing traffic. The smart hard shoulder is great if your only jumping down one junction.
    Undertaking is fine and legal - end of.
    The status or speed of the traffic being undertaken is irrelevant. However, the onus and responsibility for completing the undertaking manoeuvre safely lies with the person performing the undertaking maneuverer.
    Smart motorways do generally work in high traffic density situations as they bring all the traffic down to the speed of the lowest common denominator, i.e. articulated lorries, and therefore there should be no reason for anyone to change lanes, except when entering or leaving the motorway. Where the problems do occur is down to lack of forward planning by drivers who wait until the last possible moment to get into the correct lane to leave the motorway, causing either themselves to brake (having a knock-on effect) or the traffic lanes they are trying to enter to brake (having a knock-on effect). Simple planning, forward thinking, and an acknowledgement of the rule Mirror, Signal, maneuverer IF SAFE TO DO SO, would go a long way on UKJ motorways.

    Leave a comment:


  • BlueSharp
    replied
    Originally posted by SeededLoaf View Post
    4 lanes but everyone still hogs the outside 2 lanes
    But as everyone is crawling along below 60 there is no reason not to drive in the first 2 as they are nice and clear and undertaking is fine in queuing traffic. The smart hard shoulder is great if your only jumping down one junction.

    Leave a comment:


  • Troll
    replied
    Originally posted by Lockhouse View Post
    I hate the things, bl**dy speed cameras everywhere.
    Soon to come with average speed checks and road pricing cameras

    Leave a comment:


  • Troll
    replied
    Originally posted by TwoWolves View Post
    The problem with the motorways is that the left lane is full of slow-moving lorries and the next is full of lorries wanting to overtake their mate at 0.125 mph faster over the next five miles.

    Leaving only one lane for everyone else.

    Freight should go by rail.
    As seen on a lorry bumper sticker heading sarrf on the M6

    If you don't like lorries, don't buy stuff

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X