Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
There are things we don't know
Those things, some say, are the work of 'God'
There will always be things we don't know
Therefore there will always be God.
Any sufficiently advanced physics will appear as magic.
There are things we don't know
Those things, some say, are the work of 'God'
There will always be things we don't know
Therefore there will always be God.
8 pm on Channel 4. Ron Liddle tries to attack atheism but ends up getting tied up in logical knots (as you must when you attack a reasonable position). Luckily Dawkins is around to clarify the situation.
Love it when fools get shown up ...he he
I greatly sympathise woth Dawkins and his dogged patience in refuting people who IMHO are not worth it, but personally I lean to Jonathan Miller's view: I'm not an atheist, like some kind of "ist" as if it were a religion itself that I want to proselytise. I just don't believe in god, or have any use for the idea.
8 pm on Channel 4. Ron Liddle tries to attack atheism but ends up getting tied up in logical knots (as you must when you attack a reasonable position). Luckily Dawkins is around to clarify the situation.
Leave a comment: