• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Government halts serious fraud bribe investigation into Saudis"

Collapse

  • AlfredJPruffock
    replied
    Originally posted by Troll
    Britain is a signatory to an international convention that says "national economic interest" cannot stand in the way of stopping corruption.

    Article 5 of the OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions.
    This says that states should "not be influenced by considerations of national economic interest [or] the potential effect upon relations with another state".
    Good point.

    However - since when has international legislation ever been an obstacle for Blair - Iraq being one of the most glaring examples of flouting of International Law.

    Whiter my arse ...

    Leave a comment:


  • Troll
    replied
    Britain is a signatory to an international convention that says "national economic interest" cannot stand in the way of stopping corruption.

    Article 5 of the OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions.
    This says that states should "not be influenced by considerations of national economic interest [or] the potential effect upon relations with another state".

    Leave a comment:


  • wendigo100
    replied
    Originally posted by zathras
    in the case of the Cash-for-honours affair there is no definition of what a 'commercial' loan is in the act, so you cannot be found guilty of having a non-commecial loan.
    Another law that is so badly written it can't be upheld - did New Labour introduce it?

    Leave a comment:


  • zathras
    replied
    Originally posted by expat
    So the investigation was stopped "in the wider public interest". I wouldn't be surprised if the government comes to the view that continuing the cash-for-peerages investigation might undermine the government and so would clearly not be in the wider public interest.
    No in the case of the Cash-for-honours affair there is no definition of what a 'commercial' loan is in the act, so you cannot be found guilty of having a non-commecial loan.

    Leave a comment:


  • threaded
    replied
    One of the more amusing things about this fiasco is that the Americans put pressure on Blair et al to put this silly little law on the books so that the Yanks could then be given BAe business all the while looking 'lawful'. It now looks like the Saudis were onto this and said they were going French. So another one of Blairs little earners for his retirement isn't going to happen this way. Now he is spinning it as saving British jobs and some think him wonderful. Blessed fools. That Tony Blair is so corrupt it beggers belief, and people keep falling for it.

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied

    New Labour - El Presidente Blair

    Leave a comment:


  • Troll
    replied
    Originally posted by expat
    So the investigation was stopped "in the wider public interest". I wouldn't be surprised if the government comes to the view that continuing the cash-for-peerages investigation might undermine the government and so would clearly not be in the wider public interest.
    Yup
    Expect more third world style of Government going forward.... ministers above the law, morally bankrupt etc etc

    Leave a comment:


  • expat
    replied
    So the investigation was stopped "in the wider public interest". I wouldn't be surprised if the government comes to the view that continuing the cash-for-peerages investigation might undermine the government and so would clearly not be in the wider public interest.

    Leave a comment:


  • tim123
    replied
    ISTM that investiagting this at a 'local' level is a stupid thing to do.

    If one wants to do business in International trade you often have little choice but to give a 'bung'.

    The main guilty party here isn't the giver, it's the taker. But under international law our little noddy micky mouse police force have no juristriction over the taker, so they seek to prosecute the giver under some stupidly enacted local law.

    But if we are the only people doing this (which it seems is the case) everybody else in the world carries on giving bungs to win business and we freeze our own companies out of the marketplace.

    If people want to enforce this rule then the only way to do it is with a world-wide police force with international juristriction.

    tim

    Leave a comment:


  • stackpole
    replied
    Who gives a sh1t what Blair does. He'll be gone soon, the w

    Leave a comment:


  • AlfredJPruffock
    replied
    Saudi Arabia is a shining beacon to the values we uphold - freedom democracy and an ulimited arms budget.

    Those who would dissent to this viewpoint are clearly potential terrorists.

    So Ladies and Gentlemen Heres to marvellous Saudi Arabia and a very Merry Christmas to its good citizens - raise your glass high !

    PS Of course only glasses with mineral water in it - musnt upset the Saudis !

    PPS Sorry about the Christmas bit - a Happy New Year would have been better in retrospect


    Lord Pruffock Freedom Defence Systems Inc
    Last edited by AlfredJPruffock; 14 December 2006, 20:38.

    Leave a comment:


  • Troll
    replied
    As a shareholder in BAE ....I'm happy
    As a citizen of this country I'm not really suprised..

    Leave a comment:


  • Government halts serious fraud bribe investigation into Saudis

    Because the Saudis, who received the bribes, prostitutes, favours, etc, threatened to take their (not inconsiderable) ball home.

    Whiter than white, eh Mr Blair?

Working...
X