I would keep the post
and ban the poster!!!
Thanks PRC. Somewhat the wrong way round I would say.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: So what, puns are outlawed, then?
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "So what, puns are outlawed, then?"
Collapse
-
the volume of posts there has fallen: proof?
I do think moderation here is mostly a good thing, but unless a post is ***illegal/libelous*** I would leave it on the site while banning the poster.
: please indicate your criteria for determining these attributes
Leave a comment:
-
it's 8.45pm, i have a big install tomorrow 200 miles away and i'm still preparing the scripts and exe's. if you guys want to argue the toss, that's fine, but can we leave it for another day? in the meantime, it was bad [ bad ] taste!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by scotspinecc.net used to adopt that approach i believe...
And did he get shot down for it?
Admins are like mams - you can't win no matter what you do
I must admit though, this time I didn't think it was called for - its human nature to turn something horrific into comedy. We all laughed at home before as we thought one of the girls had died in a place called CockDock (turned out to be CopDock, not as funny) - but we're not bad people...
I reckon it would have turned into a serious debate (possibly slagging Chico off, but you'll never stop that!). I had already wrote 4 paragraphs with my criminology brain on (so I guess you should all thank SP now come to think of it).
Edit: Oops - I thought cc.net was a previous admin
Leave a comment:
-
If you are going to take that line, then I could point out that since they stopped anonymous postings, the volume of posts there has fallen.
I do think moderation here is mostly a good thing, but unless a post is illegal/libelous I would leave it on the site while banning the poster. That way the rest of us get a chance to comment on it and the site moves on.
Leave a comment:
-
Scotspine. Keep it down, you're drawing attention to yourself.
Did Cracker teach you anything. Play it cool son. Play it cool. Oh and don't go back to Ipswich.
Leave a comment:
-
But we can't discuss it. If someone goes over the top we don't get the chance to reply to them. If you want to raise the tone, maybe you should allow us to respond to the OTT posts
Leave a comment:
-
of course you can discuss it but with a likely 5 women dead so far, conducting a 'humorous' poll, which included a past member of this board, on the identity of the miscreant was vastly overstepping the mark.
Leave a comment:
-
It may have been in bad taste, but it would have been nice to be able to reply to it and point that out ourselves.Originally posted by scotspineyou can enquire. it was removed due to the obvious bad taste!
I really hate it when posts get deleted.
Leave a comment:
-
Why aren't we allowed to talk about it SP? Was it just the way he phrased the question, or is the subject to be avoided completely?
Leave a comment:
-
So what, puns are outlawed, then?
Might I enquire as to why the s*****l k****r post was removed?
Do we get a lot of prostitues on this board, or did a s****l k****r complain?Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Should a new limited company not making much money pay a salary/dividend? Feb 13 08:43
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Feb 12 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Feb 11 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47

Leave a comment: