Nuclear weapons

Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

threaded replied

4 December 2006, 17:30
If the Americans have the key then it is not worth a light.
Leave a comment:
Bagpuss replied

4 December 2006, 17:24
Would Jesus fire a nuke?
Leave a comment:
AlfredJPruffock replied

4 December 2006, 16:49
Originally posted by Chico

Well with the mad mullahs and the world its dog seeking nukes it would be dangerous and naive for the UK to adopt unilateral nuclear disarmament.

Now that come as a surprise - I would have thought that the money spent on Nukes could have been better used for the poor and sick - sorry smacks of Christianity that one.

Of course - now I understand - give the MPs their salary increase to 100k per year and they will happily nod through the new nukes without any fuss - simple as that.

Democracy for sale - any takers ?

Last edited by AlfredJPruffock; 4 December 2006, 16:54.
Leave a comment:
Chico replied

4 December 2006, 16:41
Originally posted by AlfredJPruffock

Before we buy more WMDs - sorry I meant nukes, and it looks like the US defence companies would get the bulk of the contracts - dual key systems - let us first recognize that for all their hard work our MPs are more than worthy of their current pay claim from a measly 64 k pa to a competitive 100 k pa.

I for one think that represents good value.

And not one party has opposed this motion.

Now - back to work with the lot of you.

More - you want More ????

Well with the mad mullahs and the world its dog seeking nukes it would be dangerous and naive for the UK to adopt unilateral nuclear disarmament.
Leave a comment:
AlfredJPruffock replied

4 December 2006, 16:37
Before we buy more WMDs - sorry I meant nukes, and it looks like the US defence companies would get the bulk of the contracts - dual key systems - let us first recognize that for all their hard work our MPs are more than worthy of their current pay claim from a measly 64 k pa to a competitive 100 k pa.

I for one think that represents good value.

And not one party has opposed this motion.

Now - back to work with the lot of you.

More - you want More ????
Leave a comment:
ZZZZ Snoozer replied

4 December 2006, 16:25
Originally posted by DimPrawn

We need:

Nukes
Immigrants
Diversity
Tax and spend
Wars
ID Cards

That's what will make Britain great again.

Also :

Tax Credits
Road Pricing
Faith Schools
Foundation Hospitals
PFI
John Prescott - cheap at £2000000

The list is endless
Leave a comment:
DimPrawn replied

4 December 2006, 16:16
We need:

Nukes
Immigrants
Diversity
Tax and spend
Wars
ID Cards

That's what will make Britain great again.
Leave a comment:
ZZZZ Snoozer started a topic Nuclear weapons

4 December 2006, 16:13
Nuclear weapons

Well, our PM (former CND member the hypocritic ****) says we need them. I guess that means that we don't.
Tags: None