- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: SQL placeholders
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "SQL placeholders"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by DimPrawnWhy give any adaptors at all, feck, we'll all implement them in C#!!! It's fun and the project has all the time in the world!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I mean, what are the chances that anyone has data in xls files? It's not like you would expect Mictosoft Biztalk to be able to consume Microsoft XL files out of the box is it. No we'll resort to low level coding everything! More lines of code, that's the answer!
PS: Yes, on a major project I worked on we did indeed have to build everything, adaptors, pipeline components, custom calls from Orchestrations and even a replacement for the HAT.
Still, it was the word 'Biztalk' which managed to secure them the out of their league project in the first place.Last edited by Joe Black; 27 November 2006, 19:29.
Leave a comment:
-
The consultancy doesn't pay income tax on that. Probably all ends up in an company registered offshore, and a donation to New Labour ensures the tax man turns a blind eye. Get real. Income tax.
Leave a comment:
-
I'm not implementing it mate. A consultancy that charges £1500/day per developer is.
Makes my cost look like petty cash.
Leave a comment:
-
Then paying a few grand for custom adapter should not be a problem then, perhaps you can sacrifice some of your fat threaded-like margin for that?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DimPrawnWorth every penny of the £10,000 processor license!!!
Leave a comment:
-
Wow Joe, that's great news.
So all anyone has to do to use Microsoft Biztalk with xls files is to resort to implementing their own custom adaptor?
That's so thoughtful of them not to put an obvious piece of functionality into their product. Hey let's let everyone reinvent the wheel! Why give any adaptors at all, feck, we'll all implement them in C#!!! It's fun and the project has all the time in the world!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I mean, what are the chances that anyone has data in xls files? It's not like you would expect Mictosoft Biztalk to be able to consume Microsoft XL files out of the box is it. No we'll resort to low level coding everything! More lines of code, that's the answer! I mean, testers are free and adding custom code can only be a good thing, right?
Thank goodness for Biztalk!
It's all so easy and "feature rich"!
Worth every penny of the £10,000 processor license!!!
Last edited by DimPrawn; 27 November 2006, 18:49.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DimPrawnThey could have made Biztalk able to use xls files but they didn't.
Leave a comment:
-
They could have made Biztalk able to use xls files but they didn't.
NOW GET OVER IT!!!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DimPrawnHaven't you just answered your own question of why?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by AtWI am still on Finisar, but I believe placeholders wise it is fundamendal issue that they can't have the kind of stuff above - they want to compile statement fully, so table name should be known in advance, will have to change it the same way I do now for each query, but then prepare it (once table name is known during batch inserts) and use that prepared statement.
Also ?nnn placeholders don't seem to work in it
Leave a comment:
-
I am still on Finisar, but I believe placeholders wise it is fundamendal issue that they can't have the kind of stuff above - they want to compile statement fully, so table name should be known in advance, will have to change it the same way I do now for each query, but then prepare it (once table name is known during batch inserts) and use that prepared statement.
Also ?nnn placeholders don't seem to work in it
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Leave a comment: