• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Family law gravy train expands"

Collapse

  • northernladyuk
    replied
    Originally posted by original PM View Post
    They should make it into a reality tv prog.

    People can vote on a premium line who should get what.

    Like a cross between judge judy and I'm a celebrity only better.
    I vote that BP gets a 10 second head start and Mrs BP gets a crossbow.

    Leave a comment:


  • _V_
    replied
    Is there space for at least 20 names on the form?

    Leave a comment:


  • original PM
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    New divorce form 'invites name and shame' of adulterers - BBC News

    in most cases, involving a third party adds "conflict and complexity"

    In theory, it makes no different to ancillary relief(except one aberration recently which will probably be overturned).

    This is the worst thing to happen since form C1A was introduced - "please accuse your man of child abuse so you can get your own way".
    They should make it into a reality tv prog.

    People can vote on a premium line who should get what.

    Like a cross between judge judy and I'm a celebrity only better.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Great back to the pre-1970s.

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladyuk
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    New divorce form 'invites name and shame' of adulterers - BBC News

    in most cases, involving a third party adds "conflict and complexity"

    In theory, it makes no different to ancillary relief(except one aberration recently which will probably be overturned).

    This is the worst thing to happen since form C1A was introduced - "please accuse your man of child abuse so you can get your own way".
    Will it pre-populate the co-respondent's name into the spouse name fields on your next divorce form?

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    started a topic Family law gravy train expands

    Family law gravy train expands

    New divorce form 'invites name and shame' of adulterers - BBC News

    in most cases, involving a third party adds "conflict and complexity"

    In theory, it makes no different to ancillary relief(except one aberration recently which will probably be overturned).

    This is the worst thing to happen since form C1A was introduced - "please accuse your man of child abuse so you can get your own way".

Working...
X