Recruitment Agency Sacks July 7th employee - Contractor UK Bulletin Board

Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Mailman replied

24 November 2006, 09:46
Be a step up from flipping those burgers in McDonalds aye Tim?

Oh, you walked in to that one me old mucka!

Mailman
Leave a comment:
tim123 replied

23 November 2006, 16:40
I wish somone would give me a 19K job as water cooler operative.

tim
Leave a comment:
wobbegong replied

23 November 2006, 15:40
There's your reason, right there . . .

She started the £19,000-a-year job in Holborn in April last year

Obviously sees litigation as a means of supplementing her crappy wage.

BTW; "Nattashar" !!
Leave a comment:
Mordac replied

23 November 2006, 15:34
Leave a comment:
Mailman replied

23 November 2006, 15:32
Originally posted by Mordac

You're even more retarded than I previously suspected.

Only following in your footsteps!

Mailman
Leave a comment:
Ivor1 replied

23 November 2006, 15:15
Originally posted by ImNotFromIndia

There are always choices ... You chose your choice.

Not really a valid argument I go where the work is and that happens to be London, minimal work for me up north if any to be honest. Im too tierd for this sh*t anyway, offically in tired grumpy old man mood
Leave a comment:
ImNotFromIndia replied

23 November 2006, 14:50
Originally posted by Ivor1

?? not sure how to take that, I live in London not out of choice but for work ??

There are always choices ... You chose your choice.
Leave a comment:
Ivor1 replied

23 November 2006, 14:38
Originally posted by ImNotFromIndia

No more than she deserved.
I mean, if you live in London then you must expect tulipe like that.

?? not sure how to take that, I live in London not out of choice but for work ??
Leave a comment:
ImNotFromIndia replied

23 November 2006, 14:33
Originally posted by Ivor1

http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/a...ked/article.do

Ok we dont know the full story behind the scenes, but kind of sums up recruitment agents.

No more than she deserved.
I mean, if you live in London then you must expect tulipe like that.
Leave a comment:
tim123 replied

23 November 2006, 13:29
Originally posted by Sockpuppet

Sorry for her but I dont think that she is telling the whole truth in that article.

Kind of like that kid that was dragged out of the car at gun point. Daily Mail headline "Cancer Victim held at gunpoint". WTF has cancer got to do with him being held at gunpoint. Does it make him more of a victim.

My immediete response to hearing this was "how can pointing a gun at someone give them cancer?"

tim
Leave a comment:
Mordac replied

23 November 2006, 13:06
Originally posted by Mailman

However...seeing as this involves an agents...then she is probably in the right

Mailman

You're even more retarded than I previously suspected.
Leave a comment:
Mailman replied

23 November 2006, 13:03
Originally posted by Mordac

It's just possible she was crap at her job, and she's using what happened as an excuse to extract sympathy (and more importantly cash) from the company.

Anything is possible and we have only heard one side of the story. However you can bet your bottom dollar that her former boss will dig up as much dirt as possible to paint her as black (pardon the pun ) as possible and that she was really really really sh1te at her job.

However...seeing as this involves an agents...then she is probably in the right

Mailman
Leave a comment:
Ivor1 replied

23 November 2006, 12:56
Originally posted by Mordac

It's just possible she was crap at her job, and she's using what happened as an excuse to extract sympathy (and more importantly cash) from the company.

Mordy in "More cynical than I used to be" Mode

I agree possibly more to it, but recruitment agent are still wanna-by wideboy, girls scummers anything for a dig
Leave a comment:
Mordac replied

23 November 2006, 12:52
Originally posted by Sockpuppet

Sorry for her but I dont think that she is telling the whole truth in that article.

Kind of like that kid that was dragged out of the car at gun point. Daily Mail headline "Cancer Victim held at gunpoint". WTF has cancer got to do with him being held at gunpoint. Does it make him more of a victim.

It's just possible she was crap at her job, and she's using what happened as an excuse to extract sympathy (and more importantly cash) from the company.

Mordy in "More cynical than I used to be" Mode
Leave a comment:
Sockpuppet replied

23 November 2006, 12:47
Sorry for her but I dont think that she is telling the whole truth in that article.

Kind of like that kid that was dragged out of the car at gun point. Daily Mail headline "Cancer Victim held at gunpoint". WTF has cancer got to do with him being held at gunpoint. Does it make him more of a victim.
Leave a comment: