• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "How large a working majority will Tories get?"

Collapse

  • northernladyuk
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    Good to see you think the UK is less nice than USA, Saudi(or any other Middle East country), China, Russia, North Korea.
    Boo hoo.

    Leave a comment:


  • jamesbrown
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladyuk View Post
    No, the model is still toss. It's not the outcome I'm looking at, but the internals of the model. Incidentally, constituency models have been used before (e.g. in 2015), and they are widely used in the US (for US states) by Nate Silver and others. Their performance is mixed, at best, and they fundamentally rely on national polls to distribute the votes at a constituency level. You didn't need the YouGov constituency model to predict a Hung Parliament on the basis of the YouGov polls. They (along with Survation) were the only companies whose polls were pointing to a Hung Parliament, although YouGov bottled it last minute by assigning the DKs in their final poll.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladyuk View Post
    Couldn't happen to a nicer country.
    Good to see you think the UK is less nice than USA, Saudi(or any other Middle East country), China, Russia, North Korea.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by diseasex View Post
    And what set am I ?
    The sasguru set.

    HTH BISDI.

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladyuk
    replied
    Originally posted by jamesbrown View Post
    That YouGov model is great fun.....absolute toss though. Models aside, the pollsters that rely on self-reported turnout are in for another embarrassing day on Thurs...

    I hope not, but still reckon the Tories are heading for an 80+ majority.
    Good work, yougov. They even predicted Canterbury correctly.

    http://yougov.co.uk/uk-general-election-2017/
    http://yougov.co.uk/news/2017/06/09/the-day-after/

    Leave a comment:


  • diseasex
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    You like being in the same CUK set as diseasex?
    And what set am I ?

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladyuk
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    Indeed. Its confirmation that the UK is fecked.....
    Couldn't happen to a nicer country.

    Leave a comment:


  • oscarose
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    Indeed. Its confirmation that the UK is fecked.....

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladyuk View Post
    If diseasex is the barometer of the nation, it is truly fecked.
    Indeed. Its confirmation that the UK is fecked.....

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by oscarose View Post
    You like being in the same CUK set as diseasex?

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladyuk
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    -20 to -11 diseasex oscarose

    If diseasex is the barometer of the nation, it is truly fecked.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    -10 to -1
    ContractorOnAMotorbike ContractorScum Eiriku rmilanbenes pr1 radish2008 scooterscot Whorty

    Though in the OP I did count Sinn Fein as part of opposition.

    Leave a comment:


  • oscarose
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    -20 to -11 diseasex oscarose

    Leave a comment:


  • SimonMac
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    Looks like 318 for, 332 against? So -14?
    Not quite, take away the speaker and SF it's more like 318 to 324, but for the bookies I guess -14 is right

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladyuk
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    Looks like 318 for, 332 against? So -14?
    Exclude 7 Sinn Féin seats.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X