Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Persecute, maybe not. Prosecute, maybe. If a child dies, or is going to die, because of their twisted views on blood transfusions, the legal system should intervene.
It does intervene. If the child is Fraser / Gillick competent and refuses consent and the parents also refuse consent it is more complex.
So best persecute them? You're a right Brexit charmer.
And you're a right cretin. It's a good job some of us have some free minutes on our hands to call you out. You're so desperate for a headline it's almost embarrassing.
Persecute, maybe not. Prosecute, maybe. If a child dies, or is going to die, because of their twisted views on blood transfusions, the legal system should intervene.
Leave a comment: