Originally posted by RonBW
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: The Big NIC U turn
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "The Big NIC U turn"
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by LondonManc View PostIf they've let you substitute and work how you want, they're treating you as a contractor. Not sure you're providing the best example.
HMRC will have their hands full of low-hanging PS fruit for the next few years, including retrograbs.
It's nothing about what HMRC will do and whether they have their hands full or not. If the client is issuing a blanket rule without looking at individual working practices and contract then you have plenty to worry about.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by AtW View PostUntil German elections out of the way things won't be clear, that's very nice way to stall negotiations, then 6 months after end of year, and this leaves almost no time for May to get anything - exactly the position EU wants to be in.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by northernladyuk View PostExactly.
Mind you it's equally easy for parliament to repeal or amend the European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Act 2017. That would be fun.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by AtW View PostUntil German elections out of the way things won't be clear, that's very nice way to stall negotiations, then 6 months after end of year, and this leaves almost no time for May to get anything - exactly the position EU wants to be in.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by AtW View PostUntil German elections out of the way things won't be clear, that's very nice way to stall negotiations, then 6 months after end of year, and this leaves almost no time for May to get anything - exactly the position EU wants to be in.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by jamesbrown View PostThat's the point. The direction of travel on A50 is going to reach a conclusion (insurmountable roadblock or continuation) sooner than people expect, I think - perhaps shortly after the German elections. Is the Council or the Commission going to win in their approach and how does the Parliament interfere? Everyone is expecting an 18 mo - 2yr process, but I'm skeptical TBH. It will either be an 18mo to 2yr process or it will end much more quickly, implying a GE in the UK. Also, it's easy to repeal the FTP Act.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by jamesbrown View PostThat's the point. The direction of travel on A50 is going to reach a conclusion (insurmountable roadblock or continuation) sooner than people expect, I think - perhaps shortly after the German elections. Is the Council or the Commission going to win in their approach and how does the Parliament interfere? Everyone is expecting an 18 mo - 2yr process, but I'm skeptical TBH. It will either be an 18mo to 2yr process or it will end much more quickly, implying a GE in the UK. Also, it's easy to repeal the FTP Act.
Mind you it's equally easy for parliament to repeal or amend the European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Act 2017. That would be fun.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by AtW View PostA50 negotiation won't go anywhere in next 6 months, I am pretty certain Korbin would not agree to GE and May would prefer to stall and blame EU for everything in 2019 when she finally might force GE.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by AtW View PostA50 negotiation won't go anywhere in next 6 months, I am pretty certain Korbin would not agree to GE and May would prefer to stall and blame EU for everything in 2019 when she finally might force GE.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by jamesbrown View PostThey can, but I wouldn't necessarily rule out a GE, depending on what happens with the A50 negotiation in the next 6 months. In that case, you can expect changes to tax bands/rates, as well as changes to the number of people paying them (i.e. "false self employment").
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by AtW View PostErrr? They can and they will - just not the ones they mentioned in manifesto: income tax, NICs. They can also rework the whole system, that would not be the same as simply "increasing" the taxes, would it?
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
- Why limited company working could be back in vogue in 2025 Dec 16 09:45
- Expert Accounting for Contractors: Trusted by thousands Dec 12 14:47
Leave a comment: