• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "The Russians are Coming!"

Collapse

  • Paddy
    replied
    Originally posted by stek View Post
    As the Russians say 'Vsyo idyot po planu' (Everything is going to plan)...
    Форумы полны членоголовый

    Leave a comment:


  • stek
    replied
    As the Russians say 'Vsyo idyot po planu' (Everything is going to plan)...

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
    Churchill was a halfwit in all honesty.

    He was never far from some self engineered disaster.
    At least it gives hope to some of those on here

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    Churchill was a halfwit in all honesty.

    He was never far from some self engineered disaster.

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by original PM View Post
    What personally - did he run around and steal their food?

    What were they doing for food before Churchill came to power?

    Seems to me that 15 million people died from famine when Churchill was PM and the world was at war.....
    It was essentially down to a shipping shortage. Of course complex situations that no matter what is done will have adverse effects somehwere are trivialised by cowardly lefty liberals:

    Next Churchill turned to famine relief. Canada had offered aid, but in thanking Prime Minister MacKenzie King, Churchill noted a shipping problem: “Wheat from Canada would take at least two months to reach India whereas it could be carried from Australia in 3 to 4 weeks.”8

    At Churchill’s urging, Australia promised 350,000 tons of wheat. King still wanted to help. Churchill feared a resultant loss of war shipments between Canada and Australia,9 but King assured him there would be no shortfall. Canada’s contribution, he said, would pay “dividends in humanitarian aspects….”10

    The famine continued into 1944, causing Secretary of State for India Leopold Amery to request one million tons of grain. Churchill, who had been studying consumption statistics, now believed India was receiving more than she would need. He remained concerned about the shipping problem, “given the effect of its diversion alike on operations and on our imports of food into this country, which could be further reduced only at the cost of much suffering.”11

    The Cabinet cited other causes of the famine rarely mentioned in latter-day denunciations of Churchill: the shortages were “partly political in character, caused by Marwari supporters of Congress [Gandhi’s party] in an effort to embarrass the existing Muslim Government of Bengal.” Another cause, they added, was corrupt local officials: “The Government of India were unduly tender with speculators and hoarders.”12

    Amery and Wavell continued to press for wheat, and in the Cabinet of February 14th Churchill tried to accommodate them. While shipping difficulties were “very real,” Churchill said, he was “most anxious that we should do everything possible to ease the Viceroy’s position. No doubt the Viceroy felt that if this corner could be turned, the position next year would be better.” Churchill added that “refusal of India’s request was not due to our underrating India’s needs, but because we could not take operational risks by cutting down the shipping required for vital operations.”13

    The war pressed Britain on all sides; shipping was needed everywhere. Indeed, at the same time as India was demanding another million tons, Churchill was fending off other demands: “I have been much concerned at the apparently excessive quantities of grain demanded by Allied HQ for civilians in Italy, which impose a great strain on our shipping and finances,” he wrote War Secretary Sir James Grigg. “Will you let me have, at the earliest possible moment…estimates of the amount of food which is really needed….”14

    Churchill and his Cabinet continued to struggle to meet India’s needs. While certain that shipping on the scale Amery wanted was impossible without a “dangerous inroad into the British import programme or a serious interference with operational plans,” the Cabinet grasped at every straw, recommending:

    Leave a comment:


  • original PM
    replied
    Originally posted by Paddy View Post
    Churchill was responsible for over 15 million deaths and genocide mainly through starvation in India and the Middle East. Have a Google about it.
    What personally - did he run around and steal their food?

    What were they doing for food before Churchill came to power?

    Seems to me that 15 million people died from famine when Churchill was PM and the world was at war.....

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by Paddy View Post
    Churchill was responsible for over 15 million deaths and genocide mainly through starvation in India and the Middle East. Have a Google about it.
    presumably therefore we should not have gone to war against Gerrmany

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by Paddy View Post
    Churchill was responsible for over 15 million deaths and genocide mainly through starvation in India and the Middle East. Have a Google about it.
    https://winstonchurchill.hillsdale.e...bengal-famine/

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by LondonManc View Post
    No better than Hitler? Did we indulge in genocide, intent on the removal of a race from existence?

    Dresden was more akin to Nagasaki; it was designed to bring about a quicker end to the war, which it helped to do. I know a 92-year-old who flew in the raid; he never spoke about it other than to call it a necessary evil.

    Both sides committed acts of unnecessary carnage. it doesn't matter what the reasons were.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by LondonManc View Post
    Let them. They seem to be doing far more to sort ISIS out than the septics.
    While wiping out most of the civilians in the process.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by Paddy View Post
    Churchill was responsible for over 15 million deaths and genocide mainly through starvation in India and the Middle East. Have a Google about it.
    And he was slow at rescuing Jews.

    But he "won" so could write history as he wanted.

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied
    Originally posted by LondonManc View Post
    No better than Hitler? Did we indulge in genocide, intent on the removal of a race from existence?

    Dresden was more akin to Nagasaki; it was designed to bring about a quicker end to the war, which it helped to do. I know a 92-year-old who flew in the raid; he never spoke about it other than to call it a necessary evil.
    Churchill was responsible for over 15 million deaths and genocide mainly through starvation in India and the Middle East. Have a Google about it.

    Leave a comment:


  • barrydidit
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    Good point. And taking this point further we were no better than Hitler either Bombing of Dresden - World War II - HISTORY.com
    Hey - it's scooters job to post that bollox. Stick to what you're good a.... oh, er... as you were.

    Leave a comment:


  • LondonManc
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    Good point. And taking this point further we were no better than Hitler either Bombing of Dresden - World War II - HISTORY.com
    No better than Hitler? Did we indulge in genocide, intent on the removal of a race from existence?

    Dresden was more akin to Nagasaki; it was designed to bring about a quicker end to the war, which it helped to do. I know a 92-year-old who flew in the raid; he never spoke about it other than to call it a necessary evil.

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by LondonManc View Post
    While the US administration admits to knowing that their "allies" Saudi Arabia and Qatar are funding Daesh.
    Good point. And taking this point further we were no better than Hitler either http://www.history.com/topics/world-...tle-of-dresden

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X