• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Owen Smith

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Owen Smith"

Collapse

  • LondonManc
    replied
    Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
    The MPs are the ones that the people elected. The party elected Corbyn but obviously anyone who would join a political party is not representative of the typical voter, so really this whole thing is a battle of more extreme party members vs. the people.

    All of this would be fine if we were talking about UKIP, or the Greens, or anybody else on the sidelines but we need Labour to form a viable opposition and with Corbyn the signs are that the Tories will go unopposed for a decade. Which is probably why so many Tories were happy to join Labour and vote for him.
    We don't need Labour in power; we need a decent Labour opposition to keep a Tory government on their toes. Corbyn would be capable of that if the party backed him. Support for Corbyn has been growing; a mass revolt if he's voted out by MPs could see a splinter of Labour.

    Leave a comment:


  • VectraMan
    replied
    Originally posted by LondonManc View Post
    Neither did I but I'm not a member of the Labour Party and believe that each party should sort themselves out and establish their leader, not to then have that decision reversed by the champagne socialists whose gravy train Mr Corbyn will no doubt derail should he be given the chance. I admire the bloke, albeit I don't necessarily agree with him on many things.
    The MPs are the ones that the people elected. The party elected Corbyn but obviously anyone who would join a political party is not representative of the typical voter, so really this whole thing is a battle of more extreme party members vs. the people.

    All of this would be fine if we were talking about UKIP, or the Greens, or anybody else on the sidelines but we need Labour to form a viable opposition and with Corbyn the signs are that the Tories will go unopposed for a decade. Which is probably why so many Tories were happy to join Labour and vote for him.

    Leave a comment:


  • LondonManc
    replied
    Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
    Which voters? I didn't get to vote on the leader of the opposition.
    Neither did I but I'm not a member of the Labour Party and believe that each party should sort themselves out and establish their leader, not to then have that decision reversed by the champagne socialists whose gravy train Mr Corbyn will no doubt derail should he be given the chance. I admire the bloke, albeit I don't necessarily agree with him on many things.

    Leave a comment:


  • VectraMan
    replied
    Originally posted by LondonManc View Post
    So, 208 Labour MPs are of the mind that they can pick a more electable candidate than the one that the voters actually wanted? Certainly explains the way the country has gone over the last couple of decades.
    Which voters? I didn't get to vote on the leader of the opposition.

    Leave a comment:


  • LondonManc
    replied
    So, 208 Labour MPs are of the mind that they can pick a more electable candidate than the one that the voters actually wanted? Certainly explains the way the country has gone over the last couple of decades.

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Someone told him that a vacuum was forming at the top of the Labour Party. They neglected to tell him that this vacuum comprised the space between the ears of Corbyn, Eagle, and Smith.

    Leave a comment:


  • barrydidit
    replied
    Originally posted by GB9 View Post
    Spot on. He's a hypocrite lefty. Corbyn is full blown but at least he believes what he says. Most of the lefties have millions stashed away and live in bloody big houses they inherited.
    Cheers, that'll save me wasting time on him. I'd assumed before reading this thread he was another moderate who was going to split the vote and guarantee Corbyn's continuity. Even so, he's doomed to fail of course, being more left (red) is the key in these situations. As Mao's cultural revolution taught us



    The reddest, reddest, red sun in our heart, Chairman Mao, and us together

    Leave a comment:


  • GB9
    replied
    Originally posted by barrydidit View Post
    Because I can't be arsed to research this chunt, can someone confirm my suspicion that he's running with the 'lefty looney who is not not quite as lefty looney as Corbyn' card?
    Spot on. He's a hypocrite lefty. Corbyn is full blown but at least he believes what he says. Most of the lefties have millions stashed away and live in bloody big houses they inherited.

    Leave a comment:


  • barrydidit
    replied
    Because I can't be arsed to research this chunt, can someone confirm my suspicion that he's running with the 'lefty looney who is not not quite as lefty looney as Corbyn' card?

    Leave a comment:


  • GB9
    replied
    Apparently Comrade Smith is to introduce an annual 10% levy on all BTL income.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
    Glad to be of service but the squirrels stay well outside.

    If they are a bit hungry they may be encouraged to eat Churchill and pals.
    Deal!

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by mudskipper View Post
    Or run up his trousers and nibble his nuts.
    Good to see you survived your "relaxing" experience.

    Leave a comment:


  • mudskipper
    replied
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
    Glad to be of service but the squirrels stay well outside.

    If they are a bit hungry they may be encouraged to eat Churchill and pals.
    Or run up his trousers and nibble his nuts.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    I was planning to hide in her house
    Glad to be of service but the squirrels stay well outside.

    If they are a bit hungry they may be encouraged to eat Churchill and pals.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by Churchill View Post
    So, you always were a "red".

    Come the Revolution mate, you're 2nd or 3rd against the wall.
    I'll take my chances...

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X