Originally posted by Mailman
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: We're in the wrong business....
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "We're in the wrong business...."
Collapse
-
Originally posted by zeitghostI bet the privatised ones don't...
Mailman
Leave a comment:
-
I will feel much better paying council tax this month with puny 25% discount for single occupancy knowing that the money go to frontline support...
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by mcquiggdAnd you get a cushy council pension too....
Leave a comment:
-
We're in the wrong business....
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/liv...n_page_id=1770
Council worker paid £91,000 to fix the lights
Last updated at 00:26am on 1st November 2006
A council today refused to comment on reports that one of its workers is being paid an annual wage of £91,000 despite having been off sick for a year.
The Birmingham Post reported that leaked wage sheets show that Ian Smith still receives a basic salary of £71,000 and bonuses totalling £21,000 from Birmingham City Council even though he was absent with illness for most of 2005/6.
According to the leaked documents, Mr Smith is employed by the council's Street Lighting Direct Labour Organisation as a "signals operative", though he has been the department's full-time representative for the Amicus union for several years.
The newspaper also reported that Mr Smith received an annual "standby bonus" - paid to lighting engineers to be on call to repair lights at anti-social hours - of £16,000, even though he no longer repairs lights.
A spokesman for Birmingham City Council said they were unable to comment on individual cases, but added that parts of their pay structure were based on outdated employment practice and were "clearly not fit for purpose".
The revelations come in the wake of the news that roadworkers in the city can earn up to £53,000 a year for painting lines and cleaning bollards.
Councillor Alan Rudge, the cabinet member for equalities and human resources, said: "The Council is dealing with the issue through the recognised trade unions.
It is currently in discussions with these groups and with other organisations who are representing employees.
"The Council is carrying out a pay review in accordance with a national agreement between councils and trade unions.
"The City Council has an implementation date for this review of 1st April 2007. The review will deal with, among other things, the equality and fairness of pay across the workforce.
"We cannot continue with pay and grading structures that are in some areas outdated, unfair and inflexible, not matter how difficult the change may be."
The council has set a deadline of the end of February to reach an agreement with the unions on a new pay structure. If an agreement cannot be reached by this date, the council will impose a new wage system.
A statutory document - known as a Section 188 notice - will be issued, allowing the council to terminate employees current contracts and re-employ them on different terms. The council said no-one would be dismissed without being offered re-employment on different terms.
----
And you get a cushy council pension too....Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 24 05:05
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 23 21:05
- IR35: Mutuality Of Obligations — updated for 2025/26 Sep 23 05:22
- Only proactive IT contractors can survive recruitment firm closures Sep 22 07:32
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 19 07:16
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 18 21:16
- IR35: Substitution — updated for 2025/26 Sep 18 05:45
Leave a comment: